IdahoRose wrote:
Gremmie wrote:
A lot of that clip does seem far too familiar... I remember at the beginning of secondary school before I got diagnosed never being able to find a group who would let me join them for group work in science. I used to hide in the corner of the classroom and hope that my teacher wouldn't notice that I wasn't doing the experiment.
This happened to me as well. Whenever there were assignments where we had to work in pairs or groups, no one wanted to work with me, so I never did the assignments. It didn't happen in just science class though - it could be any class where we had to have partners. Didn't matter - nobody wanted to have anything to do with me. Can't blame them though; I had virtually no social skills in my junior high years.
Actually this is why I have major issues with the "group" schoolwork model. It should always be "you can pair up, or you can do it on your own". It is one of the major flaws in the current educational model. They need to take into consideration kids who cannot socially connect but can work well on their own. Basically things are "group optional". It is one of those things that most educational professionals do not consider, it is a perspective they rarely understand. While some kids do learn better in groups, some are held back by groups or feel alienated by the groups. Every "group" project needs an individual option for kids who work better alone or do not excel in group learning environments. You can't force invidual only learners to work in groups, or group learners to accept people who do not work well in groups. You have to accomidate both.