Board index › Age/Gender related discussions › Women's Discussion

Limbaugh thinks judging Miss America makes him pro-woman

Page 2 of 2 [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Previous topic | Next topic

hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

16 Mar 2012, 11:33 am

AspieRogue wrote:
As for wealthy men, since many women here in the US & CA are employed and have the means to support themselves, they don't need a man to be a provider. Ergo, they look for other traits in men that they find attractive. Males become very agressive and competitive to attract women that do not need them to support their children. And since being a bad boy is seen as attractive to the opposite sex, then that is what unattached men aspire to.

no.

oh, wait, unless you actually have some credible evidence of this?


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


AspieRogue

16 Mar 2012, 1:02 pm

hyperlexian wrote:
AspieRogue wrote:
As for wealthy men, since many women here in the US & CA are employed and have the means to support themselves, they don't need a man to be a provider. Ergo, they look for other traits in men that they find attractive. Males become very agressive and competitive to attract women that do not need them to support their children. And since being a bad boy is seen as attractive to the opposite sex, then that is what unattached men aspire to.

no.

oh, wait, unless you actually have some credible evidence of this?



I actually do have evidence of women increasingly having children not only out of wedlock, but even without the father involved in their childs life. And contrary to popular belief, these single moms are no unemployed and/or living in poverty. They find a "baby daddy", sleep with him, and then raise his children even though he may never actually see his own kids.



MissConstrue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,052
Location: MO

16 Mar 2012, 1:21 pm

AspieRogue wrote:
As for wealthy men, since many women here in the US & CA are employed and have the means to support themselves, they don't need a man to be a provider. Ergo, they look for other traits in men that they find attractive. Males become very agressive and competitive to attract women that do not need them to support their children. And since being a bad boy is seen as attractive to the opposite sex, then that is what unattached men aspire to.


I'm not attracted to aggressive men or jerks. My youngest sister is in a relationship with a very nice guy, she's been with him for 5 years and they don't have children. But please keep up with you negative stereotypes and false assumptions about what all women find attractive in a guy. It says a lot about you.


_________________
I live as I choose or I will not live at all.
~Delores O’Riordan


hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

16 Mar 2012, 1:22 pm

AspieRogue wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
AspieRogue wrote:
As for wealthy men, since many women here in the US & CA are employed and have the means to support themselves, they don't need a man to be a provider. Ergo, they look for other traits in men that they find attractive. Males become very agressive and competitive to attract women that do not need them to support their children. And since being a bad boy is seen as attractive to the opposite sex, then that is what unattached men aspire to.

no.

oh, wait, unless you actually have some credible evidence of this?



I actually do have evidence of women increasingly having children not only out of wedlock, but even without the father involved in their childs life. And contrary to popular belief, these single moms are no unemployed and/or living in poverty. They find a "baby daddy", sleep with him, and then raise his children even though he may never actually see his own kids.

that has nothing to do with the point you made. you're adding distracting details that have nothing to do with what you actually said. it's bolded if you have forgotten.


_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105


MissConstrue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,052
Location: MO

16 Mar 2012, 1:29 pm

AspieRogue wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
AspieRogue wrote:
As for wealthy men, since many women here in the US & CA are employed and have the means to support themselves, they don't need a man to be a provider. Ergo, they look for other traits in men that they find attractive. Males become very agressive and competitive to attract women that do not need them to support their children. And since being a bad boy is seen as attractive to the opposite sex, then that is what unattached men aspire to.

no.

oh, wait, unless you actually have some credible evidence of this?



I actually do have evidence of women increasingly having children not only out of wedlock, but even without the father involved in their childs life. And contrary to popular belief, these single moms are no unemployed and/or living in poverty. They find a "baby daddy", sleep with him, and then raise his children even though he may never actually see his own kids.



Wow you really are full of it. I've worked with single moms. My middle sister works 2 jobs unlike her ex husband and she has not married since then. It seems like you have every loop hole as to why women are such awful people. They get in an abusive relationship and it's their fault. They get out of an abusive relationship, it's their fault. If they want children, they want a rich man to take care of them. If they don't want children, they want a bad boy and from what I understood you say, have children out of wedlock. Looks like you need every reason for your belief as to why women in general are such terrible people. Doesn't surprise me though given that you can't even back your claim with statistics.


_________________
I live as I choose or I will not live at all.
~Delores O’Riordan


AspieRogue

16 Mar 2012, 1:33 pm

MissConstrue wrote:
AspieRogue wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
AspieRogue wrote:
As for wealthy men, since many women here in the US & CA are employed and have the means to support themselves, they don't need a man to be a provider. Ergo, they look for other traits in men that they find attractive. Males become very agressive and competitive to attract women that do not need them to support their children. And since being a bad boy is seen as attractive to the opposite sex, then that is what unattached men aspire to.

no.

oh, wait, unless you actually have some credible evidence of this?



I actually do have evidence of women increasingly having children not only out of wedlock, but even without the father involved in their childs life. And contrary to popular belief, these single moms are no unemployed and/or living in poverty. They find a "baby daddy", sleep with him, and then raise his children even though he may never actually see his own kids.



Wow you really are full of it. I've worked with single moms. My middle sister works 2 jobs unlike her ex husband and she has not married since then. It seems like you have every loop hole as to why women are such awful people. They get in an abusive relationship and it's their fault. They get out of an abusive relationship, it's their fault. If they want children, they want a rich man to take care of them. If they don't want children, they want a bad boy and from what I understood you say, have children out of wedlock. Looks like you need every reason for your belief as to why women in general are such terrible people. Doesn't surprise me though given that you can't even back your claim with statistics.



Actually, I think that (most)men are terrible people too! :lol:


I have a very cynical view of human nature; and I refuse to idealize the opposite sex. You are MissConstrue-ing my entire world view.



blueroses
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Feb 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,183
Location: United States

16 Mar 2012, 3:40 pm

Just reading the title of this thread alone irritated me. I just don't think I have it in me today to actually read the article or the arguments of any random guys who may have decided to jump in and defend Limbaugh. Moving along ...



mntn13
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jun 2011
Age: 66
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,006

17 Mar 2012, 11:46 am

blueroses wrote:
Just reading the title of this thread alone irritated me. I just don't think I have it in me today to actually read the article or the arguments of any random guys who may have decided to jump in and defend Limbaugh. ...

+1
OP,
Limbugh makes money and is very likely is stimulated by the public comments he provides. "Thinking" has little to do with the comments, except as a means to an end, which is making money & gratification of base and immoral values.