Charis wrote:
This neatly sums up my thoughts about your uncle's reaction. Unfortunately, I don't think there will be any convincing your uncle.
Without a doubt, his mindset is based upon training from years past. At the same time, he is simply looking for a second opinion. Which, as I think about it, makes sense. After all, seeking a second opinion (and sometimes a third opinion) is quite common in the medical community.
Then, if I had that second opinion, he would reply, “I’ll be damned”.
Now, this (seeking a second opinion) isn’t something I would seriously consider. Mostly because of the expense. Also, what if the second opinion came back with something different? Would I then go for a third or even fourth opinion?
And, if I am not going to get a second opinion, my uncle would ask, “How certain are you that the person doing the evaluations is qualified?”. “How many people has this person diagnosed”? Those are great questions. While the DSM criterion is fixed, the process of determining whether the criterion is met depends upon who performs the diagnosis. There could be misdiagnosis. It happens.
It’s interesting. Given the lack of standards (regarding the diagnosis process itself), I can see why he is skeptical. I myself am (at times) a bit skeptical about the diagnosis. As I have been told, “I know someone who has Aspergers and you are nothing like them”.