starvingartist wrote:
1401b wrote:
starvingartist wrote:
i think some people are missing the irony inherent in the OP. i thought i made it pretty plain, but then again this is an ASD forum. :lol:
Yeah, it just sounds like Man hatin.
irony
[ahy-ruh-nee, ahy-er-]
1. the use of words that mean the opposite of what you really think especially in order to be funny.
dictionaries are our friends. :)
edit* to add: if my post sounds like man-hating, does that mean the post i based mine on, about women's genitals being creepy, is woman-hating?
I see, was it the actual post or the last-second add-on of "/sarcasm" that was the irony?
Regardless, it
sounds like Man hating even though you "claim" to reverse the entirety with only a single word. ("sarcasm" or later "irony")
Secondly, who cares if
another post was naughty? It is independent of the origin of this thread.
Two wrongs don't make it right.
Pointing a finger elsewhere makes this thread
appear as if it really was originally intended to be harmful.
The implied insult of
starvingartist wrote:
[...] dictionaries are our friends. :) [...]
tends to verify hostility.
I did not read the other post, nor am I required to.
I find
this one to be
immensely sexist and highly offensive. You were offensive to entirely new group of people.
And if there is
any "claim" of defending against a woman hating post, then this is also
unimaginably hypocritical.
You appear as the hater here.
You appear to be
looking for excuses to Man-bash.
It also
appears to say that you are jealous and angry
about not being able to get a man (penis) for yourself.
Are these the things you want people to think about you?
Dictionary or not.
_________________
(14.01.b) cogito ergo sum confusus