beneficii wrote:
I'll never understand girls and women wearing skirts and dresses or being made to or expected to by various authority figures, such as schools and employers. Skirts and dresses, because of that vulnerability from below, have always appeared to me to be less modest than wearing shorts or pants, yet I've heard different groups think differently: They think showing the gap between a female's thighs is immodest. Well, I think it's bull. Skirts and dresses have the potential of revealing much more in an unwanted fashion than shorts or pants.
Well, I was never made to wear at skirt at school. A lot of girls at my school wore trousers. For some reason I still ended up wearing the dreaded thing (probably my gran's doing). But when I was at home, I wore trousers because I just found them more comfy. It wasn't so much the skirt I hated - it was either having to wear tights (which were always itchy and I had to adjust them every 30 seconds) or having to expose my bare legs to the elements (thank goodness I can get cheap leggings these days - they're basically like trousers). I honestly couldn't care less about modesty - skirts are just awkward and often don't sit right if you have a booty like mine. Not that trousers are always better, but I'd generally pick the latter for comfort.
I have never heard anyone say that trousers are immodest. Maybe tight fitting ones, but that's about it.
Employers usually have a unisex dress code or uniform, but I suppose it all depends on the job. I've never had to wear a skirt at work - I just felt it looked appropriate (and it was one of those skirts that didn't ride up my ass).