zimmie wrote:
I definitely lean towards the creative/literature/language side of things. I say lean, because I have dyscalculia, like several other people here, and if I was capable I probably would have gone into a scientific field – I had very strong scientific interests when I was younger, but it quickly became aparent that I just wouldn't be able to do that kind of work.
That said, I always used narrative as a way of explaining other people's actions when I didn't understand. Unfortunately, this lead to me often constructing very interesting but simply wrong backstories for people I knew, then treating them like the truth. Not, ultimately, that good!
Me too. I really loved astronomy, dinosaurs, palentology, and pretty much everything before civilization. I also really loved stories. Around sixth grade, I started losing interest in science, and I was already a dedicated reader of fiction, so even though my science-oriented interests are still alive, they're unfed.
I also do use narrative and dialogue to explain people's actions, as well as socio-cultural analysis. This doesn't translate well into people skills (or even my fiction writing, sadly). I am aware that more importance should be given to what they think than to what I think they think, because I would like them to do the same with me.