Have you felt alienated/discounted by the autistic men here?

Page 5 of 15 [ 235 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 15  Next

old_comedywriter
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jan 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 726
Location: Somewhere west of where you are

01 Jan 2016, 11:25 pm

LKL wrote:
Spiderpig wrote:
Not being a dick on purpose is quite often taken as proof of dishonesty and cowardice. After all, truth hurts, so, if something doesn't hurt, it can't be the truth, amirite?


When I started aikido, one of my senseis was so nice that I thought that she had to be a complete fake. Nobody could possibly be that nice in reality, I thought. It took me about 5 years to realize that she really was, in fact, that nice; then I thought that she was nice, and a wimp. It took me another two or three years to realize that not only is she genuinely nice, but she is also one of the most dangerous people I know.


Reminds me of my wife...

Seriously, my wife is one of the most severely NT people I know. She is more driven by feelings than anyone I know. What do I do with her? I treat her like I want her to treat me - accepting my quirks even though they don't always make sense. In the long term, we've learned from each other - she never understood the concept of "me time" before being around me, and I never knew how to talk to an emotionally hurt person before meeting her. It's been a great 33 years.

How this applies to the OP: Yes, I am like most men, and even with my AS I see a woman with AS and just want to hug them. Even praise can be ineffective. But acceptance and saying "You are a good person just the way you are" goes a long way for everyone, on or off the spectrum.


_________________
It ain't easy being me, but someone's gotta do it.


Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

02 Jan 2016, 3:52 am

LKL wrote:
Political correctness = not being a dick on purpose.


Except when you've secretly changed the definition of what it is to be a dick, and assume it's always intentional. This is a classic bait and switch, where you claim PC means something totally innocuous that no one could possibly object to, but in the wild the word is used much more broadly to cover a lot more contentious things, e.g. saying "America is a land of opportunity" being considered an actionable "microagression" at some colleges. Don't even make me bring up sh***y Asian food and Yoga constituting cultural appropriation.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Hopper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Aug 2012
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,920
Location: The outskirts

02 Jan 2016, 6:10 am

Unfortunately, it turns out autists are as prone to taking in prejudices and absorbing thought patterns without even realising they have as are NTs. And they are just as prone to rationalising their prejudices. Not me though. I'm ace.

Throw in that, almost definitionally, Aspies are meant to be more intelligent and 'rational' than most people, this forming part of their self-image. Further, that a leaning toward 'scientific' explanations means a lot of the male understanding of male-female relationships is going to be through the lens of essentialist biology, and those rationalisations, and the defense of them, can get ugly.


_________________
Of course, it's probably quite a bit more complicated than that.

You know sometimes, between the dames and the horses, I don't even know why I put my hat on.


Amity
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,714
Location: Meandering

02 Jan 2016, 8:40 am

Hopper wrote:
Unfortunately, it turns out autists are as prone to taking in prejudices and absorbing thought patterns without even realising they have as are NTs. And they are just as prone to rationalising their prejudices. Not me though. I'm ace.

Throw in that, almost definitionally, Aspies are meant to be more intelligent and 'rational' than most people, this forming part of their self-image. Further, that a leaning toward 'scientific' explanations means a lot of the male understanding of male-female relationships is going to be through the lens of essentialist biology, and those rationalisations, and the defense of them, can get ugly.


Thank you Hopper, a great observation. The biology reference also explained a medical/social piece that has long confused me.



androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

02 Jan 2016, 11:15 am

Dox47 wrote:
LKL wrote:
Political correctness = not being a dick on purpose.


Except when you've secretly changed the definition of what it is to be a dick, and assume it's always intentional.

Just a small point ... I'm not sure if it matters if the dickishness is intentional. In fact, I think often it is not. People fall into habits of speech that they use often with their peers. When they encounter others they use the same language, but out of habit, rather than realizing their audience has changed. Of course some dickishness is purposeful. But even when it's not, I think correction is still due and the dick should be made aware of the effect of his/her language.



btbnnyr
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 May 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,359
Location: Lost Angleles Carmen Santiago

02 Jan 2016, 12:41 pm

On autism forum, I go with people say what they mean without lots of weird unsaid messages and social games. If that's not the case, I don't care, I just say what I mean and leave them to what they're doing.


_________________
Drain and plane and grain and blain your brain, and then again,
Propane and butane out of the gas main, your blain shall sustain!


LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

02 Jan 2016, 12:47 pm

Dox47 wrote:
LKL wrote:
Political correctness = not being a dick on purpose.


Except when you've secretly changed the definition of what it is to be a dick, and assume it's always intentional. This is a classic bait and switch, where you claim PC means something totally innocuous that no one could possibly object to, but in the wild the word is used much more broadly to cover a lot more contentious things, e.g. saying "America is a land of opportunity" being considered an actionable "microagression" at some colleges. Don't even make me bring up sh***y Asian food and Yoga constituting cultural appropriation.


Can't disagree with that. Some of the stories I'm hearing are so bizarre that I can't hep but wonder if it's Faux News fear-mongering: if something seems too stupid to be true, it probably isn't true. Taking offense over a Star Trek reference? Over cafeteria food?

But I don't think that's what we're talking about, here. I think this conversation is much more on the level of, 'treat other human beings like they're human beings.'

This is a good article that I think has appeared on WP before, but is somewhat relevant to the topic and worth reposting for those who haven't seen it yet: http://www.salon.com/2015/01/10/the_pli ... socialflow



League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,280
Location: Pacific Northwest

02 Jan 2016, 12:55 pm

LKL wrote:
Spiderpig wrote:
Not being a dick on purpose is quite often taken as proof of dishonesty and cowardice. After all, truth hurts, so, if something doesn't hurt, it can't be the truth, amirite?


When I started aikido, one of my senseis was so nice that I thought that she had to be a complete fake. Nobody could possibly be that nice in reality, I thought. It took me about 5 years to realize that she really was, in fact, that nice; then I thought that she was nice, and a wimp. It took me another two or three years to realize that not only is she genuinely nice, but she is also one of the most dangerous people I know.



How was she dangerous?


I remember being told in 7th grade how bad it is to be too nice or else people will think you are a phony.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.


hurtloam
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,747
Location: Eyjafjallajökull

02 Jan 2016, 1:13 pm

:evil:

League_Girl wrote:
I remember being told in 7th grade how bad it is to be too nice or else people will think you are a phony.


Niceness is only good if it's sincere. For example if one tells an ugly person that they are pretty, the ugly person thinks you're being creepy because, well, they own a mirror.

It depends on culture as well. In Britain if you are overly expressive with niceties, especially if that person is someone you hardly know, then that is seem as insincere and creepy. Americans seem to be more forward, but I've noticed that British people tend to be irritated by ott Americanness and are like, "oh just shut up already." I have an American friend who really isn't coping socially over here.

At least we can get away with smiling at strangers here. In Eastern European countries smiling at strangers is not a friendly thing to do. It is viewed with suspicion.



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

02 Jan 2016, 1:22 pm

League_Girl wrote:
LKL wrote:
Spiderpig wrote:
Not being a dick on purpose is quite often taken as proof of dishonesty and cowardice. After all, truth hurts, so, if something doesn't hurt, it can't be the truth, amirite?


When I started aikido, one of my senseis was so nice that I thought that she had to be a complete fake. Nobody could possibly be that nice in reality, I thought. It took me about 5 years to realize that she really was, in fact, that nice; then I thought that she was nice, and a wimp. It took me another two or three years to realize that not only is she genuinely nice, but she is also one of the most dangerous people I know.



How was she dangerous?


I remember being told in 7th grade how bad it is to be too nice or else people will think you are a phony.

For one thing, she can put someone on the ground without them ever realizing where they're going until they get there. For another, she'll give someone as many chances as she can to back away, behave, don't be harmful- but if she gives up on someone, decides that they need to die to protect everyone else - she will kill them with her bare hands and walk away, and never lose a night of sleep over it. I feel guilty over killing spiders, even poisonous ones; she does not.



Spiderpig
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,893

02 Jan 2016, 2:23 pm

I don't feel guilty over killing spiders by stomping them. Maybe I should; after all, I wouldn't have the balls to try to stomp a lion to death.


_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.


Evam
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 24 Mar 2015
Posts: 309

02 Jan 2016, 3:06 pm

Reading the threads where men ventilate their frustrations about not getting a girlfriend or some sex (which for some seems to be paramount of having a relationship) makes me sick, too. There is a strong over-representation of the very goodlooking type of Asperger females on youtube and elsewhere and in their videos at least they appear often very functional or/and very cute, and aspie men over-focus on this type of women because they feel most attracted by them - to the point of completely overlooking females that have the same problems they have. So probably a link to a video of yours (or several of less attractive aspie women) would help. Then emotional regulation is not exactly a strength of quite a lot of high-functioning Aspergers, so they use the opportunity to let off of their anger and frustration. I hope that it helps them to be less nasty to the next woman they feel attracted to, and this hope helps me.

Many men dont get how much of their past frustration and anger is lurking underneath when they are trying to relate to women, how it is scaring away potential girlfriends. I often feel the need to calm down someone who has more interest in me than me in him, and to reassure him that this rejection is far from being complete, even with men who have not that much trouble with finding a girlfriend. But those with autistic traits tend to see then the whole relation as a failure, as if they had done an investment that is completely lost. This is extremely disconcerting, and is actually a much more profound rejection of the other than the one they have just experienced or realized.

I appreciate it very much if a man manages to accept graciously that I dont want him as a romantic or sexual partner. The capacity to let go someone you like very much is in fact very attractive :heart: . But to understand this you probably first need to be able to truly relate to people and to appreciate also the small relations and short encounters for what they are.



Spiderpig
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,893

02 Jan 2016, 6:46 pm

Do you mean that your worries and frustrations are acceptable, but ours aren't, and that this is a good reason to be disgusted with us for making our own choices on what relationships we're interested in, rather than the ones you think we should make?


_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.


wilburforce
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Sep 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,940

02 Jan 2016, 6:59 pm

Spiderpig wrote:
Do you mean that your worries and frustrations are acceptable, but ours aren't, and that this is a good reason to be disgusted with us for making our own choices on what relationships we're interested in, rather than the ones you think we should make?


Can you specify who this comment is directed at?



dianthus
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,138

03 Jan 2016, 12:04 am

It varies but I have probably felt discounted more often by women on here. I'm not even sure if I can explain it. I don't have the words right now.



Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

03 Jan 2016, 2:23 am

AJisHere wrote:
I'm admittedly not well-informed about how things work here or exactly the culture in this place, but I get the impression it's predominantly the arguments themselves that people seem to be hating on, i.e., there is no presentation that would be acceptable. I would expect even the most mild and civil advocacy for any social justice position to draw people out of the woodwork to suggest the poster be drawn and quartered, while others try to find "nice" ways to tell the person to shut up.


Not really, though a lot of it is going to depend on what particular social justice issues you're arguing for and how you're presenting them. Don't get me wrong, you're going to get push-back if you go into PPR and argue social justice, I'll likely be leading a lot of it, but no digital lynch mob is going to come after you, unless of course you bring the torches and pitchforks yourself and start inciting people. That's kind of been the problem with SJ on this board, people who argue it tend to have this way of coming on very aggressively and being shocked and offended when not everyone is 100% on board, then throwing around loaded terms ending in ist, "calling out" the board for not being progressive enough, gnashing their teeth that presumably kind and logical Aspies don't agree with their views, etc. Then they get reported for the name calling and such (again, often by me), think they're being "silenced" when they're asked to comply with the same rules everyone else does, and generally make such a stink that everyone gets sick to death of them and starts looking for reasons to make them go away, completing the self fulfilling prophecy. I heard the last batch was banned by unanimous vote, and there were and are outspoken feminists on the mod team.

AJisHere wrote:

I've seen very little interest in a productive discourse on any such issues. It's part of the reason I've been disinclined to bother attempting it as opposed to more or less just flaming people. If I saw evidence of a culture actually willing to engage in real debate instead of shit-slinging, I'd probably try to do the former.


It's all in how you approach it, and preemptively writing everyone off probably isn't a good start. There's a member right now conducting a very rational defense of his opposition to certain feminist tendencies in PPR, citing stats and explaining himself to anyone who asks, and that's not at all uncommon.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez