ColdEyesWarmHeart wrote:
If a woman in a position of power is attractive, she'll be seen as a silly bimbo. And accused of sleeping with the right man to get the job.
If she is unattractive, men will rip her apart for her supposed ugliness, without a mention of her capabilities for doing the job she is in.
Look at the vitriol thrown at women politicians for being dowdy and unsexy. Their male colleagues aren't exactly hotties either, but no-one expects them to be, they are judged on how well they do their job.
I had that accusation lobbed at me when some of my classmates in school did not land jobs and I did. 12 years later, I'm still in the same role, and they've bounced from place to place. Yeah, totally must be my gender and sluttiness (despite the fact that I wasn't even 'active' at that point in time) and not my attention to detail and grasp of the industry.
Yeah, I get a lot of comments about how pretty I'd be 'if you'd just do something with your hair' or 'if you'd try a little bit more makeup'. I don't care about spending money or time on clothes, hair, or makeup and don't see why so many men are more interested in them than I am? What about mentioning my education, or my good projects or the publications I've been published in? No? None of them are as important as me wearing engineer's boots instead of ****-me heeled boots?
Then there's the thing back to the pretty girls... if a truly lovely woman is even remotely intelligent, huge big deals are made about it, which #1 puts unrealistic pressure and focus on their intelligence, rather than their experience, which is neither right nor fair and #2 makes the smart, frumpy women around them feel pretty darned invisible and unappreciated.