questor wrote:
One poster mentioned that as she doesn't have sex, she isn't at risk of cervical cancer...
If this was directed at me, then please reread my post as I had said that there was a
slim chance given my lack of family history and virginity.
f9 wrote:
As for cancer, yes, even the purest virgins are at exactly the same risk as the filthiest whores, and cancer does not ask whether you are asexual, lesbian, bi, hetero or …
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d3bc/7d3bcf9efde15934cee91f543d24d3d5a59b69f2" alt="Very Happy :D"
So as far as cervical cancer screening smear tests go, one's inter-vaginal activity or the lack of it is irrelevant.
You're right in saying that cancer does not discriminate. However, sexual activity plays an important factor, as do genetics and family history. Virgins with no family history of cervical cancer are not at the same risk level as those who are sexually active; rather, they're at a lower risk of developing cervical cancer and as such, pap tests do not need to be done as often.
_________________
Don't settle for someone who doesn't see your worth.