Joined: 30 Aug 2005 Age: 54 Gender: Male Posts: 887
23 Oct 2005, 11:09 am
NeantHumain wrote:
I was hoping many of you would be enthused to learn a system that enables utterances spoken in any human language to be transcribed accurately and reproduceably.
Not entirely accurate, considering that there's near infinite resolution. To approach real accuracy you have to add diacritical marks. Besides which, how are you supposed to type these symbols?
Joined: 24 Jun 2004 Age: 45 Gender: Male Posts: 4,837 Location: St. Louis, Missouri
23 Oct 2005, 3:22 pm
DrizzleMan wrote:
NeantHumain wrote:
I was hoping many of you would be enthused to learn a system that enables utterances spoken in any human language to be transcribed accurately and reproduceably.
Not entirely accurate, considering that there's near infinite resolution. To approach real accuracy you have to add diacritical marks. Besides which, how are you supposed to type these symbols?
For phonological transcription of English, diacretic marks for things like vowel length are unnecessary. We're talking about phonemic representations here, not phonetic ones.
You can take the Unicode character by typing an ampersand (&), then a number sign (#), then the decimal value of the symbol, and then a semicolon (;).