jayssite wrote:
What do you think? I have met another aspie before (in real life), and I was able to communicate with him on a MUCH higher level than I'd ever previously experienced with anyone else. A lot of our communication was nonverbal, but we also talked much more naturally than is usual for me. (This was before I even knew about AS, so it's not like I was just more comfortable because I knew we both had AS in common.) It was really, really cool to be able to accurately pick up on someone's nonverbal communication for once.
So it is my belief that aspies just communicate differently - not worse - than NTs do, as if on a different wavelength. (In fact, I daresay aspies communicate better than NTs, skipping smalltalk BS and getting right down to exchanges of actual substance. But that's a different argument.)
Think about it. NTs have a hard time socializing with aspies, too. That's why they're generally less-than-eager to talk to you after they realize how much effort it takes to prevent awkwardness. If both people have a hard time with the situation, which person is "wrong"? Neither. So why is it perceived to be the aspie's fault? Solely because the aspie is the one who is different (in relation to the rest of society).
Hypothetically, if aspies weren't the minority, I don't think so many aspies would dislike being around people. But in today's NT society, the typical aspie experiences emotional damage early in life which probably screws him/her up more than AS would alone. That's why aspies are usually withdrawn and not very social, because of rejection, not because of AS itself.
I definitely found that I understood my Aspie friend 10x better then my other friends who are "normal". I just have the same way of talking, and we understand each other because we've experienced the same thing.
I find that it's different in person then online.