Analog vs. Digital
Probably the wrong comparison words, but some times that's how it strikes me.
I, an aspie, am visual. I turned it into a career actually. My wife, who is not, stores the info in her head completely different. I remember in pictures, sounds, smells, colors... She remembers precise info like birthdates, account numbers, phone numbers, she can recall a phone number some one told her over an hour ago. I can't remember a name after 15 seconds without creating a pictographic reference of a letter in their name, combined with other visual data. And just creating that much data and storing it in a way I can recall it takes longer than 15 seconds (I'm a disaster at parties...especially without name tags). Oh, I'll remember their face 15+ years later, but the name data without visual aid is lost pretty instantly.
Clocks for instance. She prefers digital. She looks at it and know exactly what time it is. I look at it and I see a number....but I have to then translate that in my head to an actual (as I see it) point in time. I prefer Analog. I see a clock, the shape the hands make together and that shape translates instantly to a visual array of images as to what the time of day is (especially if I am not near a window) or what I should be doing at that point in time.
Google maps is another good one. Say we are going some where we have not been before. She will go to Google maps, enter in her address and read through a page of turn by turn instructions and be good to go. I really don't know how she does that. I go to Google maps, and ignore the turn by turn instructions (as they make no sense to me any way) and look at the map, download and print the raw map AND satellite map, "read" it over remembering landmarks, building shapes and colors, street names by pictographic references I either make up or already have, and then I am good to go (but I take the maps with me of course). But wait! Some one calls and states "Hey, we are going there too! Can you give us directions?" to which I reply "Hang on, I'll get my wife..." because my (attempt at) translation backwards into words that they will understand will most likely not work.
So the streams of words flowing through my head are mostly imagery interlaced with words, but even the letter of the words at that point are somewhat pictographic. As for the words, I tend to use phrases and words that, like in the diagnosis, tend to make me sound arrogant and/or strange... But that's because some words seem to strike in my head with greater impact and therefore, make sense to use. So is this all related to Asperger's? I think so, but we all find our own individual ways adjust and cope in our attempt to understand the world around us. It seems that for all of us, it takes some kind of effort beyond the "usual".