My self-diagnosis of Asperger's Syndrome

Page 2 of 7 [ 110 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

queerpuppy
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2005
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 224
Location: S.E. London

07 Jan 2006, 12:43 pm

AQ: 41
EQ: 19
FQ: 37
SQ: 32

My AQ has gone up since last I did that test - it is usually around 37. I think this may be because I have been feelig more down lately, and I understood a couple of the questions better. (<i>As a child did I enjoy playing games that involved pretending with other children </i> being one of them. I did enjoy imagination games, but mostly alone!)

I also feel I have become more comfortable admitting that I am not actually that interested in the minutiae of other people's lives - I am much more interested in discussing their interests than who they first kissed!

Robin



quietangel
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 362
Location: Maryland

07 Jan 2006, 1:06 pm

I think my AQ score was about the same as last time I took this test.
The EQ was low... Which I find interesting as I can easily empathize with things on TV but with friends etc it is quite difficult.

Here's my scores:

46/50 AQ
12/80 EQ
32/135 FQ
51/80 SQ

The friends quotient is proably based on how I like to interact with friends, more on doing things than for the relationship, however, some have seen me as a good friend (probably because I am not backstabbing or underhanded.) Oh and I listen well and offer good ideas on helping situations (not emotionally)


_________________
I research therefore, I am.
Just call me "Miss Communication"


Beenthere
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Age: 57
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,013
Location: Pa.

07 Jan 2006, 1:15 pm

TY these were interesting...although the third one really took some thought.

AQ: 42/50
EQ: 10/80
FQ: 29/135
SQ: 51/80



Sophist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,332
Location: Louisville, KY

07 Jan 2006, 2:18 pm

quietangel wrote:
I think my AQ score was about the same as last time I took this test.
The EQ was low... Which I find interesting as I can easily empathize with things on TV but with friends etc it is quite difficult.


Hey, I find it easier to sympathize with characters on tv than with people IRL, too. :) Interesting.


_________________
My Science blog, Science Over a Cuppa - http://insolemexumbra.wordpress.com/

My partner's autism science blog, Cortical Chauvinism - http://corticalchauvinism.wordpress.com/


Archimedes
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jan 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 19

07 Jan 2006, 2:23 pm

I suppose that if it's OK for Wired and the Guardian, then it's OK for me also.

From that Guardian article; in ()'s are my figures:

EQ:
Asperger: 20 (9 - 33)
Normal male: 42 (26 - 51)
Normal female: 47 (37 - 59)

0-32: Below average
33-52: Average
53-63: Above average
64-80: Very high

SQ:
Asperger: 40-50 (20 - 52)
Normal male: 30 (19 - 42)
Normal female: 24 (15 - 34)

0-19: Below average
20-30: Average
40-50: Above average
51-80: Very high

Notice that the two sexes overlap significantly; one must be careful to to avoid making "men are from Mars, women are from Venus" inferences of strict difference.

As to how I did it, I extracted the text and the scoring from the original PDF's, and then ran some programs that wrapped them in the appropriate HTML and JavaScript. The ranges I optained from the statistics in the text, where available (mean +/- stdev), and by eyeballing the graphs, if necessary.



Sophist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,332
Location: Louisville, KY

07 Jan 2006, 2:59 pm

Good job, Archimedes. And welcome to WP btw. :)

PS- I hope you put in an avatar of the owl from Disney's Sword in the Stone. ;)


_________________
My Science blog, Science Over a Cuppa - http://insolemexumbra.wordpress.com/

My partner's autism science blog, Cortical Chauvinism - http://corticalchauvinism.wordpress.com/


Grey
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2005
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 59
Location: Bay Area, California

07 Jan 2006, 3:30 pm

Musical_Lottie wrote:

SQ - I'm extremely methodical in certain aspects, but not in others. I often wonder how certain things work, if it randomly interests me, but if I'm not interested then I really am not! If I'm interested in something I'll wonder about it and become obsessed to an extent (if not beyond :roll: ) but if it doesn't interest me then I couldn't care less. If that makes any sense. Ie certain information I will catalogue and research, but otherwise I'm not bothered. If I'm interested then I'll probably be systematic, but if not then I won't. Argh! Does anyone understand that?!


You're making perfect sense to me. I'm the same way.


_________________
Doesn't play well with others.


Grey
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2005
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 59
Location: Bay Area, California

07 Jan 2006, 3:37 pm

Thanks for doing this, it was very useful.

I didn't write down my scores, but I'm well into the aspie range on all of these.

Some of the questions confused me, I couldn't parse what the question was trying to ask, or the question was imprecise and the answer depended on how I interpreted the question.

I suspect that my confusion here is also a product of being aspie. I can see an NT answering these without thinking about them so hard.

Grey


_________________
Doesn't play well with others.


Musical_Lottie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 656
Location: Bedfordshire, East of England

07 Jan 2006, 3:50 pm

Grey wrote:
Musical_Lottie wrote:

SQ - I'm extremely methodical in certain aspects, but not in others. I often wonder how certain things work, if it randomly interests me, but if I'm not interested then I really am not! If I'm interested in something I'll wonder about it and become obsessed to an extent (if not beyond :roll: ) but if it doesn't interest me then I couldn't care less. If that makes any sense. Ie certain information I will catalogue and research, but otherwise I'm not bothered. If I'm interested then I'll probably be systematic, but if not then I won't. Argh! Does anyone understand that?!


You're making perfect sense to me. I'm the same way.


Oh phew :)


_________________
Spectrumite ... somewhere.


Archimedes
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jan 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 19

07 Jan 2006, 7:41 pm

I appreciate of all the appreciation I've gotten for my efforts. :D

I've discovered that the Wired AQ-test page still exists, but also that Wired's server no longer calculates one's score. But at least my pages will not suffer from that problem. :) And my pages seem to work properly in all your browsers.



Serissa
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,571

07 Jan 2006, 9:24 pm

AQ: 39

May do the other tests later



Musical_Lottie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 656
Location: Bedfordshire, East of England

08 Jan 2006, 6:14 am

Archimedes wrote:
I've discovered that the Wired AQ-test page still exists, but also that Wired's server no longer calculates one's score. But at least my pages will not suffer from that problem. :) And my pages seem to work properly in all your browsers.


Plus all the links are in one place, and the pages are all in the same format :)

You have made one aspect of life so much easier! :P :D 8)


_________________
Spectrumite ... somewhere.


Tally
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2004
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 276

08 Jan 2006, 12:33 pm

Thank you for putting them all online together.

I scored:
AQ: 48
EQ: 15
FQ: 16
SQ: 45

I found the FQ one really hard, since some questions asked about situations I've never been in. Like, would I make more effort to maintain old friendships, or to make new ones? The answer is that I don't have any friendships to maintain, nor do I make new ones. So I'm not sure how reliable that result can be, since I had to guess a lot.



Tekneek
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 22 Dec 2004
Gender: Male
Posts: 281

08 Jan 2006, 1:20 pm

grayson wrote:
37/50
The third test was really hard for me -- I thought some of the questions were impossible to answer. For example, #7:
    (a) If I moved to a new area, I would put more effort into staying in touch with old friends than making new friends.
    (b) If I moved to a new area, I would put more effort into making new friends than staying in touch with old friends.
I would put very minimal effort into either one. The result (whether I stayed in close contact with old friends, or not, and whether I made many new friends, or not) depends on other people: whether old friends contact me, whether new people befriend me.


That is exactly what I was thinking. I'd more than likely lose contact with old friends and not make any new ones.



Bland
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jan 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,430
Location: USA

08 Jan 2006, 7:07 pm

Bland-My scores were as follows:

AQ=28/50

EQ=16/80

FQ=62/135

SQ=41/80

I find the test interesting but confusing. I know that my scores would be different if I would have been tested as a child. I have trained myself to do the "right thing" so that its almost like second nature. So I always wonder should I respond with my first instinct or what I know to be most approriate? Also, I agree with Grayson. Iwould not keep in touch with old friends nor pursue new ones. I usually make friends because they pursue me. Sometimes, Ill forget to call them for days and days and theyll think something is wrong. I just get involved in my life and forget to keep in touch. I dont even keep in touch with my own parents and siblings. I do feel that I have learned to be much more empathetic than my score shows but thats the difference between my initial reaction, and how I know I should be.



neongrl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2005
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 704
Location: Delhi, Ontario, Canada

09 Jan 2006, 10:57 am

AQ = 38

EQ = 16

SQ = 40

FQ = 52