Shelby wrote:
I guess in fairness to doctors, they can't be knowledgable about every illness and condition
I agree we cannot expect them to know everything, which is why it is both acceptable, and necessary for doctors and medical practitioners to recognise the limits of their clinical competency, and to be very cautious in keeping their subjective beliefs (however strongly held) out of their practice.
Doctors are there to give their clinical opinions and employ their clinical expertise. In those areas where they lack such expertise, they should refrain from practicing. Doctors have no more business giving 'clinical' advice about matters outside their expertise, than they have giving 'clinical' advice about who to vote for or what religion to take up.
Doctors should not be practicing/advising in areas where they lack basic competency, especially when the 'non-expertise' being employed, consists of erroneous and denigrating stereotypes about us that could easily be corrected by reference to readily available, modern literature and research. I know these doctors think they know about autism, but racists think they know about the targets of their prejudice too.
When doctors do not know about some condition as clinicians, whatever they think they know as laypersons, they need to refrain from practicing beyond finding information about physicians who can practice in the particular area, and consulting with the patient to make a referral accordingly. No more and no less is appropriate.