Spokane_Girl wrote:
earthmonkey wrote:
Not every autistic advocate who opposes Jenny McCarthy's approach to discussing autism in the public forum has not read the book - though I do know what you mean by some people who just have a knee-jerk reaction just based off of some very surface things. But, truthfully, many people just get exposed to her ideas through what she says on TV and such, not just by reading the book.
But
this review is by an autistic advocate who read the book from the library and talks about it.
What confused me in the review was this line:
Quote:
Her husband is an idiot who doesn't want Evan to be "fixed".
Why would she say he is an idiot? Wouldn't we all be proud of her husband because he doesn't wish to "fix" him? Lot of us are against that word and cure. "Fixed" was Jenny's word, not her husband's.
She's referring to how McCarthy's writing reflects on her black-and-white thinking perceptions of those around her - i.e. that to Jenny, her husband is an "idiot" for not wanting Evan "fixed". Not that this is what the blog author herself actually thinks of the idea of not "fixing" autistic people.
violet_yoshi wrote:
It's really difficult to choose. I'm tempted just to vote for PETA, cause I really dislike PETA. So is that cool?
Heh. I feel similarly (for a number of reasons about that org), and I am vegan. But I really don't think they had too big of a negative impact, compared to the others. Maybe if they kept up with it longer.
Anyway, I think it is much better to focus on positive, constructive things to do, than to continue railing on the destructive things that have already come and gone. Yes, we should combat the misinformation as it comes, but generally the focus should be on positive awareness and actual progress.
(Edited for spelling.)
_________________
"There are things you need not know of, though you live and die in vain,
There are souls more sick of pleasure than you are sick of pain"
--G. K. Chesterton, The Aristocrat