ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
What if it's so simple as it being a lie because you cannot remember the original information:
"How many ice cubes were in your drink."
"Four"
"No, there were five, I remember counting how many when I put them in the glass"
Even though, technically, you forgot, it can still be called a lie, of sorts. Honesty would mean saying
"I don't know how many were in there, I forgot to count."
I agree. I hate that there are so many people who secretly don't know the truth, but say so confidently that it's something else. It's apparently in most adults. Some people recite incorrect statistics because of this, and word gets around, and soon enough we're all mislead. This happens with rumors, politics, the media (including reports who like to give estimates without telling us they're just estimates), and too much more.
Just say: "I forgot; I think there were four," or "about four," which would still be accurate because of the
about meaning more or less. It doesn't make sense for someone to lie because they forget. I think some people are embarrassed for being mistaken as dumb or forgetful, or they like to sound like they know what they're talking about. This actually happens to me often, and as a constant personal experience, it's very bothersome.
Whatever the case, like someone said earlier, if you just tell the truth, then you'll avoid a lot of misfortune.