Rose_in_Winter wrote:
fiddlerpianist wrote:
Rose_in_Winter wrote:
I am shocked and offended that anyone would compare the decision not to reproduce to abortion.
*sigh* Show me where in this thread anyone has compared the decision to not have kids with abortion.
Right here:
just because you have AS, it does not automatically follow that any child you might ever have will have it as well. Its not a disease virus that infects everything you ever touch. And if you use THAT as an excuse for not wanting children, you're EXACTLY THE SAME as the people who want in utero testing so they can abort any potentially autistic (or dyslexic or redheaded) fetus before it becomes viable.
If that does not seem like a comparison to you, we're just going to have to agree to disagree. Saying "if you use THAT [the chance of a child being Autistic] as an excuse for not wanting children, you're EXACTLY THE SAME as the people who want in utero testing so they can abort any potentially autistic..." is the part that strikes me as a comparision (the rest of the quote is for context). It's the part the poster added emphasis to by using capitals that especially makes me think it is a comparison. If I say, "My dress is EXACTLY THE SAME as her dress," I am comparing our dresses and declaring them the same.
Even a phrase such as "exactly the same" means different things to different people. Which criteria are you using to determine whether the dresses are exactly the same? Are they exactly the same color, make, model? Do they have the same amount of wear on them? Do they both have a slightly ripped seam on the left shoulder? The only way that it's indisputable is if you and your friend physically share the dress. Then it literally would be exactly the same dress.
Willard is saying that both are essentially eugenics and have the same intent and result. He's saying that the dresses are exactly the same, and you are saying, "No, they're not physically the same dress." Therefore, your opening statement, "I am shocked and offended that anyone would compare the decision not to reproduce to abortion" demonstrates that you missed this and overgeneralized Willard's statement, that you simply picked a poor choice of words to express your understanding, or that you willfully misrepresented the statement for dramatic effect.
Quote:
Specifically, this poster is comparing the decision not to have kids because of the risk of AS or Autism to deciding to abort a fetus we learn has AS or Autism. Not just the decision not have children, but specifically not having them because of the chance of AS or Autism. Abortion is a hard decision that can leave women with terrible emotional scars, even if she feels it was the right decision. Choosing to remain child-free is not the same at all.
Yet both have the same intent and produce the same result. No "bad" genes passed onto the next generation. The dresses aren't
physically the same dress, and choosing not to have kids and abortion are not physically (or even emotionally) the same thing. But they are the same when the appropriate contextual criteria is applied.
_________________
"That leap of logic should have broken his legs." - Janissy