Dox47 wrote:
It depends upon the situation; I for one can intuitively understand mechanical concepts simply by looking at them and can then re-engineer the principle into a new and innovative use, I've yet to meet the NT that can do that. If however the situation is picking up a girl at a crowded bar, then no, most of us are at a definite disadvantage, including me. Change the situation again to trying to pick up a date online, and suddenly I'm Mr. pick up artist, everything is dependent on context.
Big "Agree" here. I can do that with mathematical and statistical problems. I can see that your methodological problem is simply the inverse of something I came across ten years ago, with a little help from another method I know, so here is your solution. But I cannot tell, when leaving friends' houses, whether it is appropriate to hug/kiss goodbye, and if so (i.e. when I see others doing it)
how to do it. I just have no intuition for these social situations, but give me a statistical problem to solve from my data and I am a duck in its favorite pond.
I am a problem-solver, except when it comes to social and emotional problems: then I am all at sea ("alexithymia"). I am ahead of the crowd in logical intelligence (top 1%), and way behind in social and emotional intelligence (bottom couple of %). We have strengths, and we have weaknesses. NTs are more often all-rounders: jack of all trades, master of none. Where I work, I tend to be the technical specialist doing arcane things that only I know how to do. I am the master number cruncher, but please don't ask me to manage anything, I cannot do that. And I still have problems with shyness and getting upset in situations where other people wouldn't.
Oh, and then there are the sensory sensitivity problems... aaaargh!