PURE WIN: new study data
Wednesday June 9, 2010
Nature has just published a research study conducted by a huge collection of geneticists at institutions around the US and UK. The group analyzed the genome-wide characteristics of nearly 1,000 individuals with autism, and discovered an array of inherited and genetic differences which are more common among people with autism than among the general population.
According to NewsWise, the study highlights the incredibly complex nature of autism spectrum disorders. One researcher, in fact, suggested that each "autism" may be unique:
The study confirms earlier findings in smaller samples that some children carry private genetic mutations that are unique to them, contributing to their susceptibility to autism.
"We found many more disrupted genes in the autistic children than in the control group," said Dr. Stanley Nelson, UCLA professor of human genetics and psychiatry. "But here's where it gets tricky -- every child showed a different disturbance in a different gene.
A BBC article underscores this point:
The discovery of so many genes which all play a small part in the disease may help explain why the disorder manifests itself differently in individuals. Each person has a unique combination of faulty genes.
Intriguingly, several researchers are quoted as saying that this study may lead to development of new tests or treatments for autism. Yet it's hard to imagine how such tests could be developed based on a finding which says, in essence, that every person with autism has a unique set of genetic differences which manifest in unique ways. As always, the findings lead to as many questions as answers... and the promise of a quick-and-easy test, treatment or cure seems a bit like science fiction.
Source: About Autism
Gets better: edit
“You and I may have just as many deletions in our genomes, but since they don’t hit genes, we don’t have autism” or other diseases, says Anthony Wynshaw-Boris, a medical geneticist at the University of California, San Francisco, who was not part of the new study. “This is a natural part of being a human being. We get mutations. Most of the time it’s not a problem, but sometimes it hits a gene involved in autism.”
In the new study, an international consortium of researchers analyzed the genetic makeup of 996 people with autism and 1,287 people without autism to discover genetic factors that contribute to the disorder. The researchers found more than 5,000 copy number variants in people with autism, usually places where DNA was missing. Many of the people with autism had more than one spot in the genome where they were missing large chunks of DNA, each about 30,000 base pairs long.
Each of the specific variants was rare on its own, with even the most common found in less than 1 percent of people in the study. Often, people with autism inherited the rare variants from their parents, but just under 6 percent of them had new deletions not found in their parents. Such new mutations may account for some sporadic cases of autism, the researchers say.
“Most individuals with autism are genetically unique,” says Stephen Scherer, a genome scientist at the Hospital for Sick Kids in Toronto and one of the leaders of the study. He says that researchers are likely to find even more copy number variants involved in autism. Some people may have larger or smaller deletions than were examined in the study.
Source: sciencenews.org
Edit: for sheer amusement
Welldone! you've found autism is even MORE diverse and complex and your excited there might be testing and therapy coming closer.............
People Donate to autism speaks?!?!?!
_________________
crime drama webnovel: AS and NT Officers, please read and review!: http://scribblesnwriting.webs.com
Waiting for the 'scientists' to realise thinking a 240volt dc fridge not working in a home with 240 volt ac mains mean
I just read this on The Guardian. It is a big breakthrough. It answered many questions I had about autism being passed down through genes and why only some people given the MMR vaccine 'became' autistic. Not to mention the fact that the rest of my family don't have an ASD, apart from my dad, but he was never diagnosed.
_________________
My band photography blog - http://lostthroughthelens.wordpress.com/
My personal blog - http://helptheywantmetosocialise.wordpress.com/
And then some, because 96.5% of autism has a basis other than the identified copy number variations ("The population attributable risk provided by the combination of all ASD CNVs that overlap ASDs and/or intellectual disability genes is estimated to be 3.3% (Supplementary Table 11)"). Other genetic variations probably bring the total to about 10% of autism having an identified genetic basis, so far.
The authors did gather some really useful reference materials, including the clinical features associated with the identified locii, into a large appendix at http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/va ... 146-s1.pdf
CockneyRebel
Veteran
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 117,079
Location: In my little Olympic World of peace and love
DemonAbyss10
Veteran
Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,492
Location: The Poconos, Pennsylvania
Were all mutants like I thought XD
too bad no gamebreaking superpowers :/
_________________
Myers Brigg - ISTP
Socionics - ISTx
Enneagram - 6w5
Yes, I do have a DeviantArt, it is at.... http://demonabyss10.deviantart.com/
I have always been suspicious that the Genome Project was just a strategy to blame the victims of vaccine poisoning. The reporting that the mutations don't originate with the parents is the most damning part. Where, or how do they originate. The fact is, if you search vaccines and spontaneous genetic mutations, you'll find where they likely originate.
It doesn't say that the mutations never originate with the parents, only that they sometimes don't. In any case, it is common for de novo mutations to occur spontaneously, and I think that most of the mutations involved in autism affect brain formation, so they would have no effect if they were acquired after birth.
Things were maybe easier when it was called Nature versus Nurture instead of being called Genes versus Environment. People always seem to think genes are bad and mutations are worse.
This particular study looks at bits of genome that repeat with repeat counts that vary between people. I don't see anything bad about having a genetic explanation for a characteristic. Human eye colour and the beautiful patterns on butterflies are genetic.
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=5662
No, the original paper seriously refutes that possibilty, check this article to see why.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Hello Friends! I need Parent Input For my Study <3 |
20 Dec 2024, 2:39 pm |
Study on Autism/ADHD Seeking Parents of children 6-12 |
23 Dec 2024, 9:17 pm |
Seeking Autistic Volunteers for Doctoral Dissertation Study |
30 Oct 2024, 6:46 am |
Major study uncovers higher dementia rates in older adults |
03 Jan 2025, 7:21 pm |