Fragile X study offers hope for autism treatment
Fragile X study offers hope for autism treatment
The research suggests that a certain class of drugs could help reverse Fragile X syndrome, the most common inherited cause of mild to severe intellectual disability and marked attention deficits, as well as social, language, emotional and behavioural problems.
These drugs are not yet approved, but are expected to go into human safety trials in America next year. If shown to be safe on adults, they will be tested on children, who are expected to benefit the most.
Hopes of the first treatment flow from a study, published today in the journal Neuron, in which mice developed to mimic the severe disease had diverse symptoms corrected by tinkering with a single gene.
"These findings have major therapeutic implications for Fragile X syndrome and autism," says lead author Prof Mark Bear, director of the Picower Institute for Learning and Memory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Autism is a catch-all term for a wide range of symptoms - usually marked by an inability to recognise and show emotions. Fragile X syndrome affects mostly boys at a rate of one in 4,000, with girls affected at half the rate and up to one-third of boys and young men with Fragile X qualify for having an autistic spectrum disorder.
Today's work backs the theory that many of the severe symptoms - learning disabilities, autistic behaviour, childhood epilepsy - stem from too much activation of a protein that picks up messenger chemicals in the brain - the metabotropic glutamate receptor, known as mGluR5.
"I think this may be relevant for children with mild autism too," Prof Bear told The Telegraph.
Fragile X and several other gene mutations that cause autism suggest that autistic behaviours may be linked to excessive manufacture of proteins in synapses, the junctions between brain cells. " If this hypothesis is correct, therapies targeting mGluR5 could be helpful," he says.
Fragile X is also marked by excessive and more spindly brain connections, memory loss, and changes to the growth and electrical properties of brain cells. "Remarkably, all these excesses can be reduced by reducing mGluR5," said Prof Bear.
Individuals with the syndrome have mutations in the FMR1 gene, which encodes the Fragile X mental retardation protein, FMRP.
The study found that FMRP and mGluR5 are at opposite ends of a kind of molecular seesaw. They keep each other in check, and without FMRP, the mGluR5 signals run rampant to cause the severe symptoms.
The research team found that a 50 per cent reduction in mGluR5, a realistic target in patients, fixed the many problems in the Fragile X mice, improving brain development and memory, restoring normal body growth, and reducing seizures.
The researchers used genetic engineering to reduce mGluR5, but the same thing could be accomplished by a drug. Although not yet approved by the US authorities, mGluR5 blockers are entering into human clinical trials.
"Insights gained by this study suggest novel therapeutic approaches, not only for Fragile X but also for autism and mental retardation of unknown origin," Prof Bear says.
"If the compounds are safe, the first efficacy trials would be in adults with Fragile X. maximum benefit is expected if the treatment is begun early in life, so ultimately the goal would be to have the drug approved for use in affected children.
Earlier this year, researchers led by Prof Susumu Tonegawa - the 1987 Nobel laureate and professor at MIT - used a different approach to fix Fragile X. By inhibiting an enzyme in the brain, the researchers managed to halt the development of the condition.
Lynne Zwink, of The Fragile X Society, said: "We welcome this breakthrough. Bringing up Fragile X children and caring for them in adulthood places enormous, life-long, strains on fragile X parents, who often have more than one child affected by fragile X in their family.
"There can be no better Christmas present for our families than they hear that scientists have taken Fragile X one step further along the road to a treatment."
The new findings, along with earlier work by Prof Adrian bird in Edinburgh on the most common cause of mental impairment seen in girls, provides strong evidence that brain damage can be reversed, even if the cause is present from the start of brain development.
The studies end an argument about whether - by the time a child is born - it is too late to counter the havoc caused by faulty genes.
The work of Prof Bird's team complements that of the Americans because it focused on a disorder at the extreme end of the spectrum of symptoms of autism, called Rett syndrome, which affects at least 10,000 children in the UK alone, mostly girls. The team found that it could make Rett symptoms disappear in mice by activating a specific gene.
I don't think the so-called "science reporter" who wrote that article knew what the heck he was talking about. Fragile X is not a form of autism. The only relationship with autism is that Fragile X people are more likely to be autistic, which is a relationship also shared by disorders like Down syndrome and cerebral palsy. There's nothing about Fragile X that makes it any more related to autism than other disorders of the brain. And autism is not just "an inability to recognise and show emotions". Anybody who says that has no clue what autism is.
The science behind the idea is not actually bad. Gene therapy might change an autistic fetus into a non-autistic one. Once you're born, though, or at the very latest by the age of one or two, your brain has formed enough that gene therapy wouldn't be a cure. At most, it would be a minor improvement only detectable when you looked at a large number of people and did the statistics. At worst, it could cause severe brain damage.
_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com
Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com
AspieWolf
Veteran
Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Age: 79
Gender: Male
Posts: 657
Location: Out of my mind. Back in 10 minutes.
Thanks, but no thanks. I don't want to change the way I am. I have learned far too much by being what I am, and the way I am, and I fear that those "cures" might just jeopardize all of that. Our society seems to fear all of those who are not exactly like all of the others. But why? Because we are not as controllable? I wonder.
_________________
"A man needs a little madness...or else...he never dares cut the rope and be free."
Nikos Kazantzakis, ZORBA THE GREEK
Some of us just have a little more madness than others!
Because we cost money and change the status quo, actually.
They fail to notice that we cost money mostly because they refuse to educate properly; and they refuse to believe that the status quo needs to be changed.
_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com
Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com
When I talked about working on my social anxiety with a psychologist it dawned on me if this guy cured my social anxiety how would I act if now normal? I mean I am 40 can you teach a old dog new tricks after years of social anxiety? My lack of trust has kept me from being taken advantage off many times over the years. Would I all of a sudden become an easy mark for tricksters and con men? I do not want to get rid of all my autistic traits just the ones that meake hate to be touch or for me to touch someone. The thought of a cure would certainly put me in delema trying to figure how much would be cured or what would be spared.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Lufthansa fined $4m for treatment of Jewish passengers |
16 Oct 2024, 9:52 pm |
What are the best strategies to study for person with ASD? |
23 Nov 2024, 7:37 pm |
Seeking Autistic Volunteers for Doctoral Dissertation Study |
30 Oct 2024, 6:46 am |
Having Autism |
23 Nov 2024, 9:49 am |