Take this fascinating test (schizophrenia vs. autism)

Page 3 of 7 [ 97 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next


Do you agree that autism is extreme male brain and schizophrenia is extreme female brain?
yes 3%  3%  [ 4 ]
no 75%  75%  [ 88 ]
undecided 21%  21%  [ 25 ]
Total votes : 117

elderwanda
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Age: 57
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,534
Location: San Francisco Bay Area

05 Sep 2010, 4:20 pm

I'm not diagnosed with anything, and these days I'm just considering myself NT, although I've had doubts in the past. For what it's worth, here's my results (I didn't take the poll). Some of the questions were hard to answer, because it depends on the situation.

Disorder | Rating
Paranoid: Low
Schizoid: Very High
Schizotypal: Moderate
Antisocial: Low
Borderline: Low
Histrionic: Low
Narcissistic: Low
Avoidant: High
Dependent: Moderate
Obsessive-Compulsive: Low


I looked up "schizoid" on wikipedia, to remind myself what that is. Well, I feel pretty "normal" these days, but I suppose the description of schizoid does fit me pretty well. I prefer to think of it as "introverted", though. I do enjoy the company of certain individuals at times, like certain family members. I've had phases in my life where I had a friend who I really enjoy being with, but other phases where I have no friends (and no great desire to have any). The word "schizoid" sounds like some kind of scary mental illness, but when you read the description, it's like, "So? What's the problem?"

There was one question that said, "Do others see you as being cold and distant?" I said "yes", because I'm aware that I walk past people who I might otherwise interact with, like the other parents who are picking up their kids from school. But really, who am I to say how others see me? How would I know that? Maybe I should have said "no", but I have no idea.


As far as the male vs. female brain thing, I have no idea. While I agree that male and female brains have differences, I don't feel comfortable putting them into neat little categories. I think we still know too little about the brain.



wogaboo
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 151

05 Sep 2010, 4:39 pm

TPE2 wrote:

Even in the mental side, the stereotype of Asperger's (bookish, quite, spending most time at home, not interested in sports, careful with details, etc.) seems typically "female" - this is the way that, in most societies, girls "are supposed" to behave (while boys "are supposed" to hang around with their buddys at the pub).


There are many autistic traits that are sterotypically male: Interested in science, interested in numbers, poor social skills, fascination with objects, obsessive behavior, delayed language development, localized information processing, high prenatal testosterone, don't like fiction, high crime rate, etc



capriwim
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 2 Dec 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 433
Location: England

05 Sep 2010, 4:58 pm

The majority of schizophrenic people I've known have been male. Schizophrenia has a lot in common with Aspergers - that's why it has to be ruled out in a diagnosis. I don't think it's about male brains and female brains at all. Female brains are supposed to be big on empathy, and empathy is something that schizophrenic people supposedly lack. And brain scans have shown similarities between people with schizophrenia and people with autism - both show abnormalities in the cerebellum. And the symptoms of cerebellar damage include behaviours and traits that occur in autism and which occur in schizophrenia.


_________________
'If the shoe doesn't fit, must we change the foot?' Gloria Steinem


wogaboo
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 151

05 Sep 2010, 5:19 pm

capriwim wrote:
The majority of schizophrenic people I've known have been male. Schizophrenia has a lot in common with Aspergers - that's why it has to be ruled out in a diagnosis. I don't think it's about male brains and female brains at all. Female brains are supposed to be big on empathy, and empathy is something that schizophrenic people supposedly lack. And brain scans have shown similarities between people with schizophrenia and people with autism - both show abnormalities in the cerebellum. And the symptoms of cerebellar damage include behaviours and traits that occur in autism and which occur in schizophrenia.


Do schizophrenics lack empathy? Some might say that they have so much empathy that they ascribe motives and feelings even to inanimate objects and thus are patholgical in an opposite way than autistics (who don't even see motives where they exist). And opposites are often similar. For example, fat people and muscular people are arguabley opposites but still have much in common (both are heavy, both take up a lot of space, both are too big for their clothes etc)



capriwim
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 2 Dec 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 433
Location: England

05 Sep 2010, 5:33 pm

wogaboo wrote:
Do schizophrenics lack empathy? Some might say that they have so much empathy that they ascribe motives and feelings even to inanimate objects and thus are patholgical in an opposite way than autistics (who don't even see motives where they exist).


Paronoia isn't empathy. It's based on self and what one imagines and fears for oneself, rather than based on a real awareness of other people and their feelings. Empathy is based on the other person, not yourself.

But talking of 'too much empathy', that is one of the theories of autism now - that people on the spectrum are so sensitive that they take in every emotional nuance and can't process it all, and so freeze. In fact, the research paper about this cited the Wrong Planet forums to support their theory - as apparently many people here who are on the spectrum have said that they do have empathy, but just somehow can't convey it.


_________________
'If the shoe doesn't fit, must we change the foot?' Gloria Steinem


TPE2
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Oct 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,461

05 Sep 2010, 5:57 pm

I think that "theory of mind" is a better expression for this issue than "empathy".

Schiziophrenics, "paranoids", etc. have a "theory of mind" (i.e.) they think about the thinkings of other people (this" theory" could be wrong, but they have a "theory").

However, I am not much sure of the opposite (that autistics don't have a "theory of mind").

After all, the simple fact that we spend time in this forum show that we have a "theory of mind", no?



capriwim
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 2 Dec 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 433
Location: England

05 Sep 2010, 6:02 pm

TPE2 wrote:
After all, the simple fact that we spend time in this forum show that we have a "theory of mind", no?


Yes, exactly. If I wasn't aware of you having a mind of your own, which can read and understand what I am writing, then I wouldn't post this reply to you.


_________________
'If the shoe doesn't fit, must we change the foot?' Gloria Steinem


Tinki
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2009
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 131
Location: Norway

05 Sep 2010, 6:14 pm

Disorder | Rating
Paranoid: Low
Schizoid: Moderate
Schizotypal: Very High
Antisocial: Moderate
Borderline: Very High
Histrionic: High
Narcissistic: High
Avoidant: Very High
Dependent: Moderate
Obsessive-Compulsive: Moderate

Omg 8O



wogaboo
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 151

05 Sep 2010, 6:26 pm

TPE2 wrote:
I think that "theory of mind" is a better expression for this issue than "empathy".

Schiziophrenics, "paranoids", etc. have a "theory of mind" (i.e.) they think about the thinkings of other people (this" theory" could be wrong, but they have a "theory").

However, I am not much sure of the opposite (that autistics don't have a "theory of mind").

After all, the simple fact that we spend time in this forum show that we have a "theory of mind", no?


I don't think anyone is saying that autistics have NO theory of mind, but rather we'll tend to have less theory of mind, so we'll often fail to consider things from the perspective of others or fail to take the opinions and emotions of others into account when we make decisions. By contrast, schizophrenics might have TOO MUCH theory of mind, so they'll see emotions and motives where none exist and thus have strange delusions like that their dog is trying to send them a message or that their house is haunted and angry at them.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

05 Sep 2010, 6:42 pm

TPE2 wrote:
However, I am not much sure of the opposite (that autistics don't have a "theory of mind").

After all, the simple fact that we spend time in this forum show that we have a "theory of mind", no?

Taking my own experience into account, I tend to focus heavily on my own thoughts. Sometimes it's not easy to consider other people's thoughts, emotions, and motives in a real-time setting when my own thoughts, emotions, and motives have so much weight. It might all come down to the problem with focus and multitasking. It's hard to consider myself and others at the same time as one always tends to crowd out the other.



Fintan29
Toucan
Toucan

Joined: 19 Feb 2008
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 269
Location: nevada

05 Sep 2010, 7:00 pm

Everyone's paranoia seems to be low, yet still this test says "Very High" for me. Sigh, it's true though.

Most of them are high actually. Not sure if those ones are true. There is one "Low", however, but I think that it was the most inaccurate one since according to it's description, I seem to fit that.

I knew I was one corrupt person anyway. :D



wogaboo
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 151

05 Sep 2010, 7:01 pm

marshall wrote:
TPE2 wrote:
However, I am not much sure of the opposite (that autistics don't have a "theory of mind").

After all, the simple fact that we spend time in this forum show that we have a "theory of mind", no?

Taking my own experience into account, I tend to focus heavily on my own thoughts. Sometimes it's not easy to consider other people's thoughts, emotions, and motives in a real-time setting when my own thoughts, emotions, and motives have so much weight. It might all come down to the problem with focus and multitasking. It's hard to consider myself and others at the same time as one always tends to crowd out the other.


Elaborating on your point, it may come down to a problem with shifting perspective and shifting attention, as autistics are said to have problems with executive functioning.



nick007
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,593
Location: was Louisiana but now Vermont in capitalistic police state called USA

05 Sep 2010, 7:12 pm

TPE2 wrote:
nick007 wrote:
. I am an ISTJ personality type on all the Myers Brigs test I've taken(strong I & very strong J) I think Schizoids are generally ISTJs but I'm not sure.


http://www.schizoids.net/forum/showthread.php?t=5297

At least at schizoids.net, most people are INTJ (45%) or INTP (32%), like at the WrongPlanet, btw. However, it is very possible that "N" types could be over-represented in Internet.

But one of the symptoms of SPD is "excessive preoccupation with fantasy and introspection", what I think points to "N".


I fantasies quite a lot & I am a very weak S & weak T. Wiki has a chart on symptoms of Schizoid with overt & covert symptoms & I think I have most of the overt symptoms & I think I have almost all of the covert symptoms. I'm positive I have most of what's on that chart

Overt :arrow:

compliant ~(in work situations or most situations offline not involving my family I am)
noncompetitive
lacking assertiveness
feeling inferior and an outsider in life
withdrawn
aloof
have few close friends
impervious to others' emotions ~( I am very sensitive but I do not understand others emotions or am aware of others emotions when I should be)
afraid of intimacy ~(I do want intimacy rite now but if I wer in a situation; I would become very afraid)
prefer solitary occupational and recreational activities
marginal or eclectically sociable in groups
vulnerable to esoteric movements owing to a strong need to belong ~(I think I could be)
tend to be lazy and indolent
asexual, sometimes celibate
idiosyncratic moral and political beliefs
tendency towards spiritual, mystical and para-psychological interests
absent-minded
engrossed in fantasy
vague and stilted speech ~(sometimes)
alternations between eloquence and inarticulateness


Covert :arrow:

cynical
inauthentic ~(I am different in different situations when I'm around different people. I'm not sure who I really am sometimes)
depersonalized
alternately feeling empty, robot-like, and full of omnipotent, vengeful fantasies
hidden grandiosity
exquisitely sensitive
deeply curious about others
hungry for love
envious of others' spontaneity
intensely needy of involvement with others
capable of excitement with carefully selected intimates
lack clarity of goals
weak ethnic affiliation
usually capable of steady work
sometimes quite creative and may make unique and original contributions ~(some people think I'm creative at times & I think I may be but I do not know how to express it)
capable of passionate endurance in certain spheres of interest
secret voyeuristic interests
vulnerable to erotomania
tendency towards compulsive perversions
moral unevenness
occasionally strikingly amoral and vulnerable to odd crimes, at other times altruistically self sacrificing
autistic thinking
fluctuations between sharp contact with external reality and hyperreflectiveness about the self ~(I'm not quite sure what hyperreflectiveness about the self means but I think it may fit)
autocentric use of language ~(I don't know what this means)



I didn't know about Schizoids.net. I'll bookmark it & check it out some latter. Are there any kind of resources for em in dating or women looking for relationships :?: I'm pretty much giving up on relationships at this point except I think a Schizoid woman mite would be the best choice for me if I wer to have a relationship. I don't think I can deal with someone who's very emotional because I do not understand their emotions & when people get emotional with me; it causes me to have emotional problems & meltdowns & it's been causing me lots of drama. I'm a very private person offline & when I'm around people offline or chatting with em online; I tend to run out of things to say with em very fast. I think a partner who is NOT overtly emotional & I could spend time around but not necessarily talking or sharing but just being near her would be best. A Vulcan woman would be my 1st choice but this ain't the StarTrek life :(


_________________
"I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem!"
~King Of The Hill


"Hear all, trust nothing"
~Ferengi Rule Of Acquisition #190
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Ru ... cquisition


Last edited by nick007 on 05 Sep 2010, 7:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

capriwim
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 2 Dec 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 433
Location: England

05 Sep 2010, 7:17 pm

Fintan29 wrote:
Everyone's paranoia seems to be low, yet still this test says "Very High" for me. Sigh, it's true though.


Paranoia is quite common for people on the autistic spectrum, because of difficulty reading other people and difficulty with central coherence. I think it increases as we develop self-awareness, because then we're more aware of the various things we can do wrong, and we have negative experiences of people responding negatively to us.


_________________
'If the shoe doesn't fit, must we change the foot?' Gloria Steinem


Aimless
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Apr 2009
Age: 67
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,187

05 Sep 2010, 9:36 pm

wogaboo wrote:
Several days ago I posted a topic asking whether autism was the opposite of schizophrenia and whether the former was extreme male brain and the latter was extreme female brain. My questions were inspired by articles like this:

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the ... le-brain-w

Many people rejected this theory, often providing empirical studies and anecdotes to debunk the idea. I however remain attracted to the elegance, simplicity and symmetry of this theory. The goal of science is to come up with simple parsimonious explanations for complex phenomena and to fit new observations into existing frameworks so simply expanding the neurological spectrum that differentiates men and women, to include autistics and schizophrenics is a good place to start.

But one problem is that autism and schizophrenia are both vaguely defined elusive traits. As others here have asserted, schizophrenia may actually not be a single disorder (and the same may be said for autism) so perhaps only one form of autism is the opposite of one form of schizophrenia, while other forms of schizophrenia may be better categorized as autism.

I think it would be fascinating and potentially informative if everyone here who has been diagnosed with autism/aspergers took the following personality test and reported their results here and then we could all pool are brain power to look for patterns in the data and ways of interpreting them:

http://www.4degreez.com/misc/personalit ... er_test.mv

Here are my results:

Paranoid: LOW
Schizoid: HIGH
Schizotypal: MODERATE
Antisocial: MODERATE
Borderline: LOW
Histrionic: MODERATE
Narcissistic: HIGH
Avoidant: MODERATE
Dependent: LOW
Obsessive-compulsive: MODERATE (I disagree with the test results on that one. I'm extremely obsessive-compulsive)

Since I've been diagnosed with aspergers, my profile may have theoretical implications (despite being a sample size of one on a test of unknown validity). The fact that I'm low on paranoid is consistent autism being extreme male brain because men being physically stronger have less to fear than women, so evolution may have predisposed more male brains to be less paranoid than female brains. This also fits with paranoid schizophrenia being extreme female brain. It also explains why many autistics are so gullible. We are not paranoid enough and thus at risk for trusting anyone.

The fact that I'm also low on the Borderline trait also fits with autism being the opposite of schizophrenia since Borderline was originally meant to describe borderline psychotic, so being low on borderline makes me the opposite of psychotic/schizophrenic

Apparently I am also very narcissistic. This fits the extreme male brain theory because men are more egotistical than women, so this theory would predict that autistics would be especially egotistical.

On the other hand I am high on the schizoid trait which contradicts the idea that autism is the opposite of schizophrenia, or may suggest that certain schizophrenic traits have been misclassified and are actually autism.


Disappointed. By the title of the thread I thought there would be a test to determine whether you had a more female or male brain. The personality disorder test has shown up here before and I'm not sure how it relates to the autism vs schizophrenia topic. Anyway, I know just by reading the description that I have a more female brain and btw my sister's son has paranoid schizophrenia (maternal link). I also know that I fit the first two diagnostic criteria of autism. I think mind blindness is not an absolute either/or thing.



MXH
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain

05 Sep 2010, 9:43 pm

I think this test is biased on being a yes/no test compared to the typical 4 answer test.
Mine
Paranoid: Very High
Schizoid: Very High
Schizotypal: High
Antisocial: High
Borderline: Moderate
Histrionic: High
Narcissistic: Very High
Avoidant: High
Dependent: High
Obsessive-Compulsive: Moderate

I dont get what these answers mean since they are overly exaggerated compared to the situations i face. I do have to answer yes but its not as strong as the test shows.