ManErg wrote:
Delirium wrote:
You have to be kidding me. How are you going to verify people's neurological status?
How do gay bars verify people's sexual orientation?
Exactly. Dude, you got it.
Peko wrote:
I'm really surprised that could possibly be allowed
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6af0/a6af0253fc47f52f9e58caa950ec8811f1975586" alt="Confused :?"
... b/c I'd think that would look like "discrimination" even though we'd be banning those who (in many cases) discriminate against us.
Yes, that's why it's surprising that in the original story, it seems it's now allowed in some cases to discriminate against heterosexuals.
I would guess most NT's wouldn't go near an Aspie bar (like most straights would never go in a gay bar). No loud music and ostentatious status displays! The point is that as a sub-section of society that gets routinely discriminated against by the masses, we do have a right, just like gays, to demarcate our own spaces, to change the world into what we want rather than just having to fit in.[/quote]
Personally, I wouldn't mind being in a bar (ordinarily I just don't go to them, or on dates or anything either) if it were socially acceptable to read a great big fat book there; even better if it were cool to discuss it with someone who could actually hold a conversation about it.
Otherwise, I suppose flirting can be fun, done with the right person, but completely meaningless. Not that books make me feel like flirting; how frivilous. But, that's the point. Such a bar could have non-compulsory flirting.
_________________
.. one day
in murky water mild,
where Wednesday lay
A Thursday child ..