The problem is that the poll assumes that you will definitely be having kids of your own, and will definitely have a preference. Of course, it's probably morally better in many cases to adopt if you're going for NT. In many cases, we'd make sucky parents.
But the question is whether, given that we're having kids of our own and can choose, we want them to be autistic or not. And it's NOT hard to be patient with an autistic child. Or rather it is, but no harder in absolute terms than to be patient with an NT child. A lot of the difficulties supposedly inherent in dealing with people on the spectrum are actually inherent in a clash of neurology, which does not apply for us. If you as a PERSON can't relate to your children (which I doubt you can know unless you have them), you're unfit to be a parent, but that means you shouldn't have NT children either.
Yes, that's no guarantee that we'll relate to our children. It merely opens the faint possibility that we maybe possibly could, rather than making it utterly impossible. I don't know about you, but, child of my body or not, I'd have a hard time loving an NT child that I had to cuddle constantly and who was always trying to manipulate me.
The world is becoming a better and better place for autistics; why let ourselves die out right when the next generation might actually have it easy, or at least as easy as NTs?
There are reasons not to have kids at all, but those aren't really relevant to the poll.
_________________
I'm using a non-verbal right now. I wish you could see it. --dyingofpoetry
NOT A DOCTOR