Page 5 of 5 [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

paulandsam
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 7 Sep 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 1

07 Sep 2010, 11:09 pm

my results were
EQ: 50
SQ: 92
Extreme Systemizing
Does that mean im autistic????
I always thought i had something as i am different to others. Never tried to find out cause i always had it in my head that they would think im making it all up.



ScottyN
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 457
Location: Calgary, Canada

08 Sep 2010, 12:35 am

EQ=6
SQ=106

Extreme systemizer



Clyde
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 337

08 Sep 2010, 1:07 am

Took this test some time ago and found I got the same results:

EQ= 15

SQ= 111 Extreme SQ



lyricalillusions
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 651
Location: United States

08 Sep 2010, 2:35 am

EQ: 19
SQ: 73
Extreme Systemizing

I'm not sure whether I agree with the results, exactly. I probably do have systemizing mind, but not an extreme systemizing mind.


_________________
?Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.? _Theodor Seuss Geisel (Dr. Seuss)


Woofb
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 16 May 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 8
Location: United Kingdom

08 Sep 2010, 2:55 am

Extreme systemiser

EQ: 18
SQ: 51

Aspie girl, comparatively strong intuitive deficits but huge blind spots for systemising. I have an interest in systemising words/grammar, library systems, and collections of things. I'd think out how to choose a computer in a systemising way, but not a car or a stereo (not interested enough). Can't think in terms of betting, finance, strategy, dates, weather or road systems. Frustrated there was no question for literary criticism; I approach lit crit in a highly systematic and precise way, and love analyzing how words work, but there was relatively little attention given to 'verbal systematising'.

Main difference in the emotional side seems to be poor intuition and fine distinctions, coupled with a difficulty in figuring out how I'm feeling or should be feeling, and weaker-than-average immediate emotional reactions. I wouldn't like seeing an animal in pain, but I wouldn't describe myself as feeling its pain. When I 'feel for others' to some extent it involves a conscious effort to imagine how I'd feel in their position rather than a leap of intuition.

The disturbing thing is that my deficits are far more visible than my strengths. Professor Baron-Cohen tends to say that weak emotional intuition is the price we pay for systemising strength, but according to this my empathic qualities are very weak while my systematising abilities are merely average. I think it's not a sufficiently well-tuned instrument to pick up my strengths!



27315
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2010
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 79
Location: Sweden

11 Oct 2010, 8:51 am

EQ: 28
SQ: 126

I'm dissapointed at the EQ score as I think I'm very epathic.
But the SQ is no suprise :D



richie_uk
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 1 Sep 2009
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 33
Location: UK, South East

25 Mar 2011, 9:25 am

I got this for mine,
Your Score 14 75 Extreme Systemizing



sanahasacat
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2013
Age: 29
Gender: Female
Posts: 32
Location: Truro

02 May 2014, 9:55 am

EQ: 50 (female average - 48)
SQ: 6 (female average - 51)

"Extreme Empathiser"

Hmm... not sure if that suprises me or not, haha. I knew my systemizing score would be low, but I wasn't expecting it to be that low. The EQ score is probably about right, though; I can be very intuitive but am also incredibly ditzy and things go over my head simply because I was too distracted to notice them.

(Edit: I put the female averages there as a comparison point because its what people read me as and the people who typically but not exclusively share my biology are women, not because I actually am or should be considered a member of that gender.)


_________________
Genderfluid (please use neutral ( they/thempronouns), cognitive and motor dyspraxia, possible inattentive-type adhd, maybe schizotypal, atelophobia.

Not autistic at all, but brainweird in a lot of different ways and, besides, I like it here.