walk-in-the-rain wrote:
Since the movie was based on a real couple - the important factor should be whether THEY feel like they were stereotyped.
Whale: We were but not nearly as much as we feared when we saw the original script. Both Donald and Isabelle are watered-down versions of me and my wife but since they didn´t use our real names, we can live with it.
Otherwise if it is an accurate portrayal and seems overdone or cartoonish that is a perception issue about allowing Aspies/auties to be themselves.
Whale: Every one of the aspergers and mostly autistic people in the movie was inspired by a real-life person on the spectrum. Most of them in fact weren´t savants.
Most of them were given different quirks for the sake of the story and to show the diversity within the autism community.
Sort of like no one wanting a black person to be shown in a stereotypical role shining shoes. Well if the movie was biographical/autobiographical about a black man who shined shoes than it would be silly to give him another profession because no one wanted to show sterotypes. All groups of people have certain stereotypes - some positive, some negative. I have not seen the movie either or even really read the reviews so I don't know how the people who were supposed to be represented feel about it.
Whale: My major problem with the movie is the soundtrack which sucked and the length which was too short to give the subject the depth it deserved. OTOH, it is the first movie to show a spectrum of adults and show them attempting to deal with a lot of adult issues. Hopefully, better movies will be made but it is a big step forward from the incredibly narrow and stereotypical view of autism rendered by previous movies.
Thanks to all for your comments.
Jerry Newport aka The Whale