Is it an assumption to say LFA means unintelligent?

Post Reply New Topic

Do not know about Carly, but this is true for me. Before I learned to type, I was not as smart. I had more trouble making sense of the world around me. I could not organize my actions in sequence. I had much trouble figuring out how to resolve problems because I had not good ability to identify the problems.

No one taught me but I had computers to play with since I was very young because of a parent who worked in the industry. When I learned typing words there was a reduction in chaos due to my ability to assign the words to sensations, events, situations, problems. I am not the same now as I was before I learned to type. But it is small change not much noticeable to people except in how much less time I spend screaming now than I did before.

But it is not a permanent change. Typing skill for me requires constant use and practice to maintain and even then it is not always working. It is an un-ending exhaustion that pushes out more interesting things. There is no one to take care of me if I lose my typing ability and the alternatives are not good so it is worthwhile for me. The effort may not be worthwhile to others. Happiness is more important than being able to type and be functional.

Easy. The analogy sucks.

Cogito ergo sum.


To drag your analogy back to the real world, if a psychopath does not recognise you personally as a conscious being or of having any value, should the psychopath be allowed to kill you?

I have no memories of much at all previous to the last year or two... because I couldn't make much sense of the world.

I'm one of those people who is actually quite intelligent but sometimes only communicates by nondescript whining and screaming and echolalia. Sometimes I do okay, and sometimes my communication is a hot mess. But this doesn't mean that I'm not intelligent, and I can't stand it when people talk to me like I'm 2!

I actually have a friend who is LFA. He's a year older than me, but he was held back to my year level. He's non-verbal and gets help from teacher aides on work that only he has to do, but he sometimes communicates with me through sign language or writing words down. Although he doesn't usually use complete sentences, or ones that make sense, I can still understand what he's saying. He is a bit more intelligent than meets the eye. In Prizegiving last Friday, I was surprised to hear he got a Merit award in Maths. I didn't know he was that good! Not assumption or anything, just he always said, in his way, that his Maths work was too hard.

I believe it is a greater disservice to assume a lack of intelligence than it is to assume intelligence and try to find ways to communicate so it can be expressed.

If someone has intelligence but, because of their communication disability, cannot 'prove it', I feel it is cruel and inhuman to treat that individual as if they have the cognition of an infant. It's a form of torture really. I would much rather see resources spent on compassion than on indifference.