Tsukimi wrote:
But S = detail oriented and craving for stability, which is AS-like as well.
Nevertheless most aspies are N.
This is what I mean. Maybe someone without AS would be an S type because they crave stability and are detail oriented, but they are able to stay more in-tuned with their environment. In fact, they have a difficult time tuning OUT of their environment, at all.
Most people with AS are N types, so they are withdrawing somewhat but are like S types at the same time. Different root causes for the behavior.
Maybe an ISTx is like an INTx without sensory issues, but an N type still has more insight than an S type could ever have and the ability to focus on details as well. This type is very much unlike the other types, maybe most people with AS do fit into this type naturally but also display distinct traits of other types, which other types would be less likely to display.
An INTx is more similar to an ISTx than an ISTx is to an INTx.
The S factor has a greater hold of an xSxx type than does the N factor of an xNxx, imo. An xNxx has more flexibility, possibly because they developed along a less rigid or even *disordered* path.