XFilesGeek wrote:
I'm a female and I have several on my arms. Large ones.
Of course, it seems like it's "fashionable" to pooh-pooh tattoos these days, which suits me fine because it allows me to more easily weed-out people who are inclined to judge others based on superficial nonsense. "Reverse sheep" are every bit as annoying as "sheep."
What? Has there been a time (later than prehistoric, tribal world) when tattoos were LESS fashionable than now? When I think tattoos in the "original" sense, I think prisoners and sailors - people in confined spaces with meaningless doing and obeying on a daily basis, deprived of normal means to express themselves and act as independent human beings. It seems reasonable that tattoos and similar kinds of appearal were ways to find identity and fraternity and keep their memories.
Hell, I'm not even condemning on similar subcultures today, whether they are punkers, bikers, goths, political extremists etc. What I scoff is main street citizens of my own kind with all the priviliges and opportunities one could ever wish for, who - in a superficial act - deliberately buy into a loser culture to stand out as unique or rebelious. Some of those who then complain about resistance in finding work. A selfinflicted disability.
Last edited by Larsen80 on 01 Sep 2012, 1:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.