Is Asperger's overdiagnosed or underdiagnosed?

Page 2 of 7 [ 107 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next


Do you think that AS is overdiagnosed or underdiagnosed?
Overdiagnosed; 38%  38%  [ 25 ]
Nor overdiagnosed, neither underdiagnosed; 22%  22%  [ 14 ]
Underdiagnosed. 40%  40%  [ 26 ]
Total votes : 65

AgentPalpatine
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,881
Location: Near the Delaware River

04 Jan 2013, 1:28 pm

If one strictly applied the critera, except for "impairment", you'd be amazed how many possible cases you'd get.

Let's imagine this case for a minute.....young aspie in the US, who's obsessions are (a popular sport) and fitness. If their IQ and verbal abilities are within one standard deviation of their age group, I doubt most places would pick it up. There might be a ADHD, OCD, or learning disability DX, but that's as far as it goes.

I know of cases where people have more obvious traits than I do, and they were DXed with OCD or ADHD. The DX process is socially and culturally driven, and there's no way around that, since it's based on observed traits and interviews, not on mechanically registered information.


_________________
Our first challenge is to create an entire economic infrastructure, from top to bottom, out of whole cloth.
-CEO Nwabudike Morgan, "The Centauri Monopoly"
Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri (Firaxis Games)


drewski56
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 79
Location: Cascadia

04 Jan 2013, 1:34 pm

whirlingmind wrote:
I believe that it is under-diagnosed. Mainly in women. I believe a much higher percentage of males are getting diagnosed because clinicians are far more ready with outdated views, to believe that it is more a male condition.

Once they finally wake up and smell the coffee, there will be a lot more females getting diagnosed.

Perhaps Alex, you could make this a mission on behalf of your Aspie sisters being that you are in the public eye?


+1



Wandering_Stranger
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,261

04 Jan 2013, 1:34 pm

Kairi96 wrote:
Wandering_Stranger wrote:
Kairi96 wrote:
had no obsessions that absorbed all their time


I'm curious how you'd know this?

Because other kids I met that looked more like having the "true" AS always talked about their interests and went on and on about it. I do the same.


Some of us have really embarrassing / unacceptable interests; so don't discuss them. I don't go on about my interests all the time. Does that mean I don't have AS?

Quote:
I believe that it is under-diagnosed. Mainly in women.


Quite a few females (including myself) were diagnosed with depression / a mental health issue before we received our Autism diagnosis. I do know someone who received her diagnosis when she was in her late 30s. She'd been known to psychiatry services since she was 12.



shubunkin
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 3 Oct 2011
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 189

04 Jan 2013, 1:35 pm

FalsettoTesla wrote:

I know this is slightly off-topic, but I think the assumption that if someone under the age of 23-ish wasn't diagnosed in childhood, they either don't have it, or have it mildly is rather dangerous.

Because, using the examples of my self and my two friends(ish) who are diagnosed, we all had negative home environments with parents who either didn't have to the time to, or the inclination to get our diagnosis. But that doesn't mean we didn't need them, or couldn't benefit from them.

So, maybe it's somewhere in the middle, some people who needn't be caught by the ASD net our, and some people are missed when they shouldn't be.


I wanted to add my support to the above statements and also underline what whirlingmind just wrote that Alex just agreed with : I think that there are a lot of women out there that could benefit from a diagnosis, or just knowing about AS. There is currently hardly any training given to social workers and frontline workers to help them spot someone who might benefit from being assessed in the UK. Maybe I just have only work experience to back this up and no stats, or hard evidence, but my theory is that women are being routinely diagnosed as having personality disorders ( especially borderline) as opposed to considering whether they fit with any autistic categories.

Certainly I think there is such a lot of reticence still in relating aspergers or autism to women and girls.
I believe that disorders such as anorexia ( that has links to proprioception problems and NVLD issues )that seems to affect more women than men -at least in the public's opinion, should provide medical staff with the opportunity to look and screen for any autistic problems.



Kairi96
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 19 Aug 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 426

04 Jan 2013, 1:38 pm

Wandering_Stranger wrote:
Kairi96 wrote:
Wandering_Stranger wrote:
Kairi96 wrote:
had no obsessions that absorbed all their time


I'm curious how you'd know this?

Because other kids I met that looked more like having the "true" AS always talked about their interests and went on and on about it. I do the same.


Some of us have really embarrassing / unacceptable interests; so don't discuss them. I don't go on about my interests all the time. Does that mean I don't have AS?

An expert should say that. Not me.


_________________
Please write in a simple English; I'm Italian, so I might misunderstand the sense of your sentence.
You can talk me in Spanish and Italian, too.


Wandering_Stranger
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,261

04 Jan 2013, 1:40 pm

Kairi96 wrote:
Wandering_Stranger wrote:
Kairi96 wrote:
Wandering_Stranger wrote:
Kairi96 wrote:
had no obsessions that absorbed all their time


I'm curious how you'd know this?

Because other kids I met that looked more like having the "true" AS always talked about their interests and went on and on about it. I do the same.


Some of us have really embarrassing / unacceptable interests; so don't discuss them. I don't go on about my interests all the time. Does that mean I don't have AS?

An expert should say that. Not me.


Yet, you're claiming that some people can't have ASD because they don't go on about their interests all the time? :?



kotshka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jun 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 653
Location: Prague

04 Jan 2013, 1:52 pm

alex wrote:
whirlingmind wrote:
I believe that it is under-diagnosed. Mainly in women. I believe a much higher percentage of males are getting diagnosed because clinicians are far more ready with outdated views, to believe that it is more a male condition.

Once they finally wake up and smell the coffee, there will be a lot more females getting diagnosed.

Perhaps Alex, you could make this a mission on behalf of your Aspie sisters being that you are in the public eye?


Good idea.


I'm sorry, I don't want to derail this thread, but I feel compelled to respond to this... There is only one female blogger on this site, whose articles are introduced as "the female perspective," and she hasn't written much beyond how lucky she has been and how relatively easy she has had things. I'm genuinely happy for her, and her viewpoint is valid, but it is definitely not the norm and not representative of the experiences most women on the spectrum have. I wrote to you months ago offering to write for the site, partly to give a different female viewpoint, but my message was never answered. I'd be overjoyed if you really did offer more information for/from/about women with autism and our experiences. It doesn't have to be from me and I don't even care if I'm credited if you do publish anything of mine, but please, anything you can do to help out would make a big difference. You have no idea of the frustrations female aspies often have to deal with that men do not.

Again, I don't want to derail the thread - Alex, feel free to contact me privately if you are interested in my offer.



rabidmonkey4262
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 864

04 Jan 2013, 1:55 pm

Kairi96 wrote:
I think that it's overdiagnosed. I have my reasons to think so: I saw people that claimed to have AS and were much more better than me: they looked very outgoing, had no obsessions that absorbed all their time like happens to me most of the times and the "condition" didn't seem to have a negative impact on their lives after all. My mother thinks the same: she saw people claiming to have AS that, according to her, neither showed enough AS symptoms to make a diagnosis. I can trust my mother because she's quite an expert about autism. And after all, I don't think AS is common. I met just very few people with AS in all my life (they were 4 or 5). I don't exactly know if it's me being a bit more low-functioning than those people or just AS being overdiagnosed. Please note that this doesn't mean I am discussing the diagnosis on people of this forum.
What do you think about this?


So you're basically saying that people can be too high functioning to be on the spectrum? I know people who were diagnosed very early and went through early intervention programs. They were able to remove all of the negative signs of AS and their obsessions became their careers. Jacob Barnett is the most famous example that I could think of. I also personally know college-aged autists who were part of a longitudinal study that involved early intervention. If you were to just take a superficial cursory glance, you wouldn't even think that they had autism. People always assume that I'm high-functioning, but that's only because I hide a lot of stuff. For example I can't even drive a car. My point is that just because someone is more high-functioning than you does not mean that they don't have autism.


_________________
Here's to the crazy ones. The misfits. The rebels. The troublemakers. The round pegs in the square holes. The ones who see things differently.


answeraspergers
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2012
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 811
Location: uk

04 Jan 2013, 2:02 pm

@drewski56 - how can you say +1 for under-diagnosis of ASPERGERS in women and yet support its abolition from existence in DSM5?



drewski56
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 79
Location: Cascadia

04 Jan 2013, 2:15 pm

answeraspergers wrote:
@drewski56 - how can you say +1 for under-diagnosis of ASPERGERS in women and yet support its abolition from existence in DSM5?


Quite simply, Asperger Syndrome is the currently accepted naming for a set of characteristics which are under-diagnosed in the female population. Asperger's diagnoses will not simply evaporate, the vast majority of individuals would be absorbed into ASD under the DSM-5. Without proper attention female individuals who are under-diagnosed in regards to AS under the DSM-4 will continue to be under-diagnosed in regards to ASD under the DSM-5.



Kairi96
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 19 Aug 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 426

04 Jan 2013, 2:24 pm

Wandering_Stranger wrote:
Kairi96 wrote:
Wandering_Stranger wrote:
Kairi96 wrote:
Wandering_Stranger wrote:
Kairi96 wrote:
had no obsessions that absorbed all their time


I'm curious how you'd know this?

Because other kids I met that looked more like having the "true" AS always talked about their interests and went on and on about it. I do the same.


Some of us have really embarrassing / unacceptable interests; so don't discuss them. I don't go on about my interests all the time. Does that mean I don't have AS?

An expert should say that. Not me.


Yet, you're claiming that some people can't have ASD because they don't go on about their interests all the time? :?

No. I said they didn't look like having AS to me. I didn't say they didn't have it. And however, there are other important symptoms that characterize AS, not only "obsessions".


_________________
Please write in a simple English; I'm Italian, so I might misunderstand the sense of your sentence.
You can talk me in Spanish and Italian, too.


Kairi96
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 19 Aug 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 426

04 Jan 2013, 2:25 pm

rabidmonkey4262 wrote:
Kairi96 wrote:
I think that it's overdiagnosed. I have my reasons to think so: I saw people that claimed to have AS and were much more better than me: they looked very outgoing, had no obsessions that absorbed all their time like happens to me most of the times and the "condition" didn't seem to have a negative impact on their lives after all. My mother thinks the same: she saw people claiming to have AS that, according to her, neither showed enough AS symptoms to make a diagnosis. I can trust my mother because she's quite an expert about autism. And after all, I don't think AS is common. I met just very few people with AS in all my life (they were 4 or 5). I don't exactly know if it's me being a bit more low-functioning than those people or just AS being overdiagnosed. Please note that this doesn't mean I am discussing the diagnosis on people of this forum.
What do you think about this?


So you're basically saying that people can be too high functioning to be on the spectrum? I know people who were diagnosed very early and went through early intervention programs. They were able to remove all of the negative signs of AS and their obsessions became their careers. Jacob Barnett is the most famous example that I could think of. I also personally know college-aged autists who were part of a longitudinal study that involved early intervention. If you were to just take a superficial cursory glance, you wouldn't even think that they had autism. People always assume that I'm high-functioning, but that's only because I hide a lot of stuff. For example I can't even drive a car. My point is that just because someone is more high-functioning than you does not mean that they don't have autism.

So you're saying it's just me being more low-functioning than them?


_________________
Please write in a simple English; I'm Italian, so I might misunderstand the sense of your sentence.
You can talk me in Spanish and Italian, too.


rabidmonkey4262
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 864

04 Jan 2013, 2:29 pm

kotshka wrote:
alex wrote:
whirlingmind wrote:
I believe that it is under-diagnosed. Mainly in women. I believe a much higher percentage of males are getting diagnosed because clinicians are far more ready with outdated views, to believe that it is more a male condition.

Once they finally wake up and smell the coffee, there will be a lot more females getting diagnosed.

Perhaps Alex, you could make this a mission on behalf of your Aspie sisters being that you are in the public eye?


Good idea.


I'm sorry, I don't want to derail this thread, but I feel compelled to respond to this... There is only one female blogger on this site, whose articles are introduced as "the female perspective," and she hasn't written much beyond how lucky she has been and how relatively easy she has had things. I'm genuinely happy for her, and her viewpoint is valid, but it is definitely not the norm and not representative of the experiences most women on the spectrum have. I wrote to you months ago offering to write for the site, partly to give a different female viewpoint, but my message was never answered. I'd be overjoyed if you really did offer more information for/from/about women with autism and our experiences. It doesn't have to be from me and I don't even care if I'm credited if you do publish anything of mine, but please, anything you can do to help out would make a big difference. You have no idea of the frustrations female aspies often have to deal with that men do not.

Again, I don't want to derail the thread - Alex, feel free to contact me privately if you are interested in my offer.


Just from a cursory glance at the home page, there are at least three female contributors. Their posts are not all about sunshine and daisies; they write about overcoming obstacles and coping with frustration. I don't see what the problem is. Alex probably gets hundreds of messages from people asking to be a blogger on his site. He can't just cater to every single one.


_________________
Here's to the crazy ones. The misfits. The rebels. The troublemakers. The round pegs in the square holes. The ones who see things differently.


btbnnyr
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 May 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,359
Location: Lost Angleles Carmen Santiago

04 Jan 2013, 2:32 pm

The people in my autism group, some are obviously autistic and some not, and some very high-functioning with careers and marriage and kids, and the very high-functioning ones appear least obviously autistic, but most are officially diagnosed.



rabidmonkey4262
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 864

04 Jan 2013, 2:34 pm

Kairi96 wrote:
rabidmonkey4262 wrote:
Kairi96 wrote:
I think that it's overdiagnosed. I have my reasons to think so: I saw people that claimed to have AS and were much more better than me: they looked very outgoing, had no obsessions that absorbed all their time like happens to me most of the times and the "condition" didn't seem to have a negative impact on their lives after all. My mother thinks the same: she saw people claiming to have AS that, according to her, neither showed enough AS symptoms to make a diagnosis. I can trust my mother because she's quite an expert about autism. And after all, I don't think AS is common. I met just very few people with AS in all my life (they were 4 or 5). I don't exactly know if it's me being a bit more low-functioning than those people or just AS being overdiagnosed. Please note that this doesn't mean I am discussing the diagnosis on people of this forum.
What do you think about this?


So you're basically saying that people can be too high functioning to be on the spectrum? I know people who were diagnosed very early and went through early intervention programs. They were able to remove all of the negative signs of AS and their obsessions became their careers. Jacob Barnett is the most famous example that I could think of. I also personally know college-aged autists who were part of a longitudinal study that involved early intervention. If you were to just take a superficial cursory glance, you wouldn't even think that they had autism. People always assume that I'm high-functioning, but that's only because I hide a lot of stuff. For example I can't even drive a car. My point is that just because someone is more high-functioning than you does not mean that they don't have autism.

So you're saying it's just me being more low-functioning than them?


Seeing as I don't know you, it's a question that you're going to have to answer for yourself.


_________________
Here's to the crazy ones. The misfits. The rebels. The troublemakers. The round pegs in the square holes. The ones who see things differently.


Tyri0n
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,879
Location: Douchebag Capital of the World (aka Washington D.C.)

04 Jan 2013, 2:40 pm

Overdiagnosed. It's very common to have a diagnosis of Aspergers for "insurance purposes" (my practioner's words regarding my diagnosis) when a narrower--or composite-- diagnosis might be more appropriate. A classic example is practitioners who diagnose NVLD as Aspergers/ASD in individuals without stims, intense interests, or other characteristic behaviors. Minor visual-processing issues, such as brain damage, combined with a schizoid personality might be sufficient in some cases also. Others would be certain auto-immune issues like PANDAS or simple social awkwardness caused by environmental factors, such as homeschooling, sexual abuse, or video games.

It's a big problem that Aspergers is overly broad because it is diagnosed by external characteristics rather than structural factors or causes, and practitioners don't have a policy of defaulting to the most restrictive diagnosis when applicable.



Last edited by Tyri0n on 04 Jan 2013, 2:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.