Whether it's possible to be on the spectrum without repetitive behavior is kind of the whole reason for the debate over the new ASD criteria. According to the new criteria, you apparently must have at least a childhood history of repetitive behaviors and/or sensory issues, which are often closely intertwined. (Many autistic "stims" are meant to calm agitation caused by sensory integration problems.) Older autistics, however, can often turn their repetitive behaviors into something more like the fidgets seen in non-autistics, and their sensory issues may or may not be as bad as in childhood. My personal suspicion is that if you used to have the repetitive behaviors but no longer do, you might be on the spectrum, whereas if you never had them, you're probably not. Other people have their own views on this, though.
_________________
Right planet, wrong country: possibly PLI as a child, Dxed ADD as a teen, naturalized citizen of neurotypicality as an adult