Page 4 of 7 [ 103 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

modioboy
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 23

24 Mar 2007, 12:59 am

i got 80, but it's a boring test.


_________________
just ASK the aXiS*


24 Mar 2007, 1:51 am

102.


What does your score mean?
Your Emotional IQ is in the average range. Essentially, you're able to recognize and deal with your own emotions and those of others in a reasonably effective manner. This is likely evident in your ability to relate to others, express your needs, and maintain a satisfactory level of emotional health. Since your score is in the mid-range, however, you are not taking full advantage of your potential. By learning and practicing new skills and more effective ways of dealing with people, you could increase your EIQ. After all, we can always improve our communication, ways of relating to others and resilience. The benefits will be numerous, including stronger relationships, a more successful career and better emotional health. Most of all, you will be an all-around happier person.



calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

24 Mar 2007, 2:26 am

75



blue_bean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,617
Location: Behind the wheel

24 Mar 2007, 5:40 am

I got 75

I think there's some better tests out there though :P



Sapphires
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 5 Mar 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 240

24 Mar 2007, 8:38 am

I scored 86, but I don't even know how to answer some of those questions.



Hazelwudi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 511

24 Mar 2007, 8:58 am

This quiz seems to mainly measure self-esteem, more than anything else. I wish people would stop confusing the two.



MasterKron
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 21 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 22

24 Mar 2007, 9:11 am

I got 88. I know these tests are bogus, but I think the description it gave sums me up nicely.

Quote:
There's some bad news and some good news. The bad news is that your Emotional IQ is relatively low. In a practical sense, this means that you are not reaching your full potential. Low EIQ has a negative impact on all aspects of life such as relationships, your emotional health and level of motivation. As a result of your behavior, others may view you as being critical, inexpressive, inhibited, detached, cold, or even condescending. Your difficulties relating to others and dealing successfully with your own emotions may have a negative impact on your health; people with lower EIQs are prone to anxiety, depression, excessive guilt, aggressiveness, low self-concept, and stress-related problems. Chances are that you also have difficulty bouncing back from life's problems. Now for the good news: by learning and practicing new skills and more effective ways of dealing with people, you can significantly improve your EIQ. The benefits will be numerous, including stronger relationships, a more successful career and better health. Most of all, you will be an all-around happier person.


Basically I'm not reaching my full emotional potential, but when I do I'll be a much better person for it. That's generally feel about a lot of the problems I've had to overcome, and about human development in general.



9CatMom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jan 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,403

24 Mar 2007, 9:22 am

108-average



Flow
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,500
Location: WrongPlanet

24 Mar 2007, 9:53 am

84



SeriousGirl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Mar 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,067
Location: the Witness Protection Program

24 Mar 2007, 12:44 pm

Graelwyn wrote:
I am an INTJ. My aspie ex is an INTP. Seem to be mainly INTJ and INTP with a few ISTJ thrown in among most aspies, from what I have seen on the various forums. IT seems to go without saying that many aspies have an interest in such tests.


Yes, I would expect a mix of INTJs, INTPs with an occasional ISTJ. My daugher who has the label, PDD-NOS, is INFP. I tend to irritate INTJS! The INTJ group on Yahoo groups got hopping mad at me. It's like I can find 5 reasons to agree and also 5 reasons to disagree. I can hold opposing points of view and am very "P."

I think Inventor is the rare aspie eNTP. I can be very extraverted when I find a group that shares my interests.


_________________
If the topic is small, why talk about it?


Last edited by SeriousGirl on 24 Mar 2007, 5:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Lone_Wolf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 526

24 Mar 2007, 5:33 pm

I got 79, but it didn´t seem like a very reliable test.



hyper_alien
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,039
Location: In the arms of me lover

24 Mar 2007, 8:29 pm

on the last eq test i did i scored 2.
couldnt get this one to load so i gave up.


_________________
Me.


Hazelwudi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 511

25 Mar 2007, 10:11 am

EQ measures irritate me. Few seem to operationalize that variable properly... they tend to either test for self-esteem, or test for how psychologically fragile one assumes people to be. Both are missing the mark.

You can have a high self-esteem, but no emotional intelligence. There are many confident geeks out there who have little or no grasp of the emotions of others... and frankly couldn't care less about the emotions of others in the first place.

You can assume others are so fragile that they're an emotional breakdown looking for a place to happen, but this does not mean you have emotional intelligence. In fact, a lot of people are not that fragile, and treating them as if they are comes across as demeaning and insulting.

Even operationalizing EQ as the ability to motivate others doesn't work. For example, few would argue that a drill sergeant is not highly capable of motivating military recruits... but does this mean he is sensitive to their emotional needs? Hardly.



Shale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 541
Location: New Zealand

25 Mar 2007, 6:22 pm

I find the test to be fairly good actually. They are indirect questions as a peep-hole into the inner person. It's much harder to ask proper, direct questions like in an IQ test (the Tickle one very nicely asks the testee to figure a2 + b2 = c2 and apply it, for example) because it's the human mind we're working with.

The reflection of how you see yourself DIRECTLY affects how you interact with others, unfortunately. That's why the questions are directed inward first and foremost - your world is within your body and mind to start with, then branches out to the outside world.

I suppose you could say it's quite a whimsical, metaphorical sort of test...but the results at the end pretty much hit the mark for a lot of people. Despite the fact that it's three blanket answers...lol.

But I suppose if someone got 80-something on an IQ test, they could argue that the test was rubbish because it didn't allow them to take advantage of their true intelligence :lol: It's all relative.

At the very least the test lets you know the areas of weakness, and what needs to be worked on :) Because I reckon everyone's able to at least refine their emotional and intellectual IQ, even if it's not to any remarkable extent. Humans are designed to evolve and adapt and mature, after all...ESPECIALLY in the mind.



Hazelwudi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 511

26 Mar 2007, 5:57 am

Self-esteem can affect it, certainly. However, the correlation is hardly absolute... there are too many people out there with a high self-esteem and little to no empathy for self-esteem to serve as a completely accurate predictor.



Shale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 541
Location: New Zealand

26 Mar 2007, 7:18 am

Iunno if those out there with a high sense of self-worth and little sense of anyone else's worth can be defined as having high self-esteem, but more self-confidence and arrogance. They're far stronger in that it puts ones importance far beyond everyone else's :? I think self-esteem has a lot more empathy involved.