briankelley wrote:
Sethno wrote:
briankelley wrote:
I think if you feel sure something is wrong with you psychologically or neurologically, you should get it checked out to find out exactly what it is.
Just don't go looking for a badge or a label.
So having a name for something isn't important?
Can you explain to someone else your situation without one?
I edited that statement to "don't go looking for a particular badge or label, because you may not get it". I personally feel it's better to tell whoever that you feel something is wrong with you, describe your symptoms and then let them diagnose you. It may not be what you think it is.
Lots of people are wanting to get tested specifically for Aspergers because of stuff they read on the internet. And on top of that, they seem to be hoping that they have it. I have a feeling all of the people like that coming out of the woodwork saying "Give me an Aspergers badge" are going to be taken less and less seriously.
Having a name for something is important. Deciding what that name must be before it's issued, is a mistake I think.
Me? All I have to do is show them my pediatric and school records.
What about someone who suspected autism for years, said nothing, and then had a therapist bring it up and recommend evaluation, and a doctor who said in response "Good catch"?
People need names for things, Brian. You don't disagree with that, do you?
_________________
AQ 31
Your Aspie score: 100 of 200 / Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 101 of 200
You seem to have both Aspie and neurotypical traits
What would these results mean? Been told here I must be a "half pint".