Callista wrote:
Yeah. The writer of the test seems to think that being warm, empathic, and a people person is somehow the opposite of being a psychopath. What about the detached, rational, and altruistic people? We need them too. They're the people who aren't too emotionally overcome by the horrors of a famine to plan a solution for the problem. They're the researchers who try to find cancer treatments and the paramedics who can step back mentally to think about how to keep a screaming child alive.
Being cold and rational is a personality trait, not a moral trait. If you're cold, rational, and introverted, but you spend your time saving people's lives or improving your community without caring about whether you get rewarded for it, I'm pretty darn sure you don't qualify as a psychopath.
I ran the test with a hypothetical "caring, but extroverted and capable of being detached" person, and scored just above 50%.
Just as some NTs have more autistic traits than others, doesn't mean they're autistic. In a similar way, I don't think the author of this test is trying to diagnose psychopathy, just show people how many traits they have.
They're certainly not making a moral judgement. If you use their other "tool", they score Dickens and Wilde ahead of Hitler and Thatcher. Dickens was a notable social justice campaigner, but more of a "psychopath" than Hitler because he remained calm under pressure, was fearless, and just as rebellious as Hitler in a very different way. Hitler's sky-high scores in narcissism and emotional detachment don't quite catch him up with Dickens.