There are all kinds of false assumptions, in life. (Also, the dog has woken me up.) So, I have taken the time to read what the author believes is too much thinking, or what is the wrong way to think (some hours before dawn.)
Julian Baggini wrote:
Consider the person who has a very heightened ability to understand the mental states of others, but uses this to manipulate or deceive them.
Are these autistic traits?
Julian Baggini wrote:
Or the engineer who relies too much on her ability to judge people's characters and not enough on their technical competence.
If we are to be strict, most of the people, here, (spergie autistes) should rely on technical competence.
Julian Baggini wrote:
There is one other way in which we can have too much intelligence. We kid ourselves if we think that the highest form of human life is one which leaves our brutish nature behind and devotes itself entirely to matters intellectual.
In other words, to coerce people, mentally, rather than by-force.
Julian Baggini's definition of 'too much intelligence' sounds just like the traits of a narcissistic sociopath, triggering others.
I have done it, as an experiment -- not to gentle people -- but a couple of real bastards. Weaponized autism.
You are organized, abstract, and have high mental energy. You can easily drive someone into the ground, if you want to fixate / obsess.
But, the highest form of trolling is supposed to be getting them to complete a task, of your own choosing.
Or, you can call that 'too much intelligence,' if you think it is wrong.