Stupid 'experts'
Well, when I was a kid I didn't realise people had thoughts of their own that differed to mine, and I didn't feel nor show that much empathy to other people. So while what they say might not apply to you or more higher functioning people, it was true for me and many like me.
It's not just as black and white as 'lacks empathy' and experts know this. They just need to elaborate to those people who take what they say at face value.
_________________
My band photography blog - http://lostthroughthelens.wordpress.com/
My personal blog - http://helptheywantmetosocialise.wordpress.com/
It's not so much affective empathy, but there are deficits with cognitive empathy in those with ASD, whether that be mild or severe is another story.
A large part of it has to do with not picking up and/or understanding social cues. I have read many stories where an ASD person will be blamed for being cold where they do not identify a person as, for example, being sad or any reason why they would be sad (cognitive empathy), but when they realize the person was sad, they do feel sad (affective empathy).
The problem is, the person with ASD is technically being 'cold' and will inevitably give off that vibe to others in these circumstances. Even if they mean well, if they don't know someone is sad (nor realize any reason for them to be), affective empathy won't be displayed.
_________________
Unapologetically, Norny.
-chronically drunk
It's not just as black and white as 'lacks empathy' and experts know this. They just need to elaborate to those people who take what they say at face value.
To be fair, a lot of NTs don't have much empathy, either. They often know people have different perceptions and thoughts outside of their own, yet they don't care. I have noticed a lot of people with ASD have too much empathy. Once they figure out people have different perceptions and thoughts, they grow even more empathetic. The reason they weren't (for some) is because they thought people were exactly like them. So, once you explain this, it's like something "clicks", because we DO have empathy. If someone is depressed and I don't know it, as soon as I find out, I immediately shift my focus to them. If only I could always tell peoples' emotions, I'd be like a therapeutic god. (I was totally exaggerating and joking)
What papers? And studies are bunk if they just ASSUME something without even correctly observing behavior.
It's becoming more well known that plenty of autistic people have empathy (the ability to imagine yourself living someone elses life and experience things how they did).
What papers? And studies are bunk if they just ASSUME something without even correctly observing behavior.
It's becoming more well known that plenty of autistic people have empathy (the ability to imagine yourself living someone elses life and experience things how they did).
Studies have published papers or, at least, articles. In these, the procedures and results are very detailed (we cannot accept science ad verecundiam). Then their are misinterpreted and published by unqualified people, causing confusion and more misinterpretations.
Nobody has said that autistic people have no empathy. And empathy it's not just "putting yourself in other people's shoes".
What papers? And studies are bunk if they just ASSUME something without even correctly observing behavior.
It's becoming more well known that plenty of autistic people have empathy (the ability to imagine yourself living someone elses life and experience things how they did).
Studies have published papers or, at least, articles. In these, the procedures and results are very detailed (we cannot accept science ad verecundiam). Then their are misinterpreted and published by unqualified people, causing confusion and more misinterpretations.
Nobody has said that autistic people have no empathy. And empathy it's not just "putting yourself in other people's shoes".
I didn't say empathy is JUST "putting yourself in other peoples' shoes". In this context, the OP is using that definition.
Yes, people DO say autistic people have no empathy. Not only the general public, but I'm sure you will hear plenty of stories from people here about psychologists, psychiatrists, medical staff, and even some researchers (more in the past) who have thought autistic people have no empathy.
People also used to think autism was caused by "refrigerator mothers". That had no scientific basis, yet was EXTREMELY common. There are plenty of examples in history of people, including well known scientists who had flawed conclusions and studies. These influenced the public's view on everything from mental illness and autism to other diseases and health.
The flawed conclusions, along with the bad studies, are usually outed at a later date like what is happening with autism.
Yes, people DO say autistic people have no empathy. Not only the general public, but I'm sure you will hear plenty of stories from people here about psychologists, psychiatrists, medical staff, and even some researchers (more in the past) who have thought autistic people have no empathy.
People also used to think autism was caused by "refrigerator mothers". That had no scientific basis, yet was EXTREMELY common. There are plenty of examples in history of people, including well known scientists who had flawed conclusions and studies. These influenced the public's view on everything from mental illness and autism to other diseases and health.
The flawed conclusions, along with the bad studies, are usually outed at a later date like what is happening with autism.
Some say that they do not have empathy because they do not show empathy. Usually they are talking about cognitive empathy and normally they generalize (they can't observe the subjects 24/7 nor read their minds). Even in this forum many aspies comment that they cannot infer what other people think ("think" in the broad sense).
Refrigerator mothers theory was suitable 50 years ago, when the knowlodedge about autism was minimal. And it did have scientific basis.
You cannot invalidate a study beacause you don't like the results.
nirrti_rachelle
Veteran
Joined: 21 Jul 2005
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,302
Location: The Dirty South
I hear you bro. Have had a lot of that growing up, being talked about without asking me for any input
That gets on my last one. And the scientific research community does this constantly. Now I know little autistic children may not be able to articulate their experiences but there are plenty of spectrum adults out here who can. I guess we grown folks on the spectrum don't exist to these scientists or something.
_________________
"There is difference and there is power. And who holds the power decides the meaning of the difference." --June Jordan
I think the "lack of empathy" that experts relate to autism is correctly described as "lacking the ability to show empathy." When I was younger, I had no idea to to pick up social cues and act certain ways based on what the people I was interacting with were feeling. After a lot of special ed and childhood therapy, I have a sense of empathy that is more learned than innate. I have learned how to recognize how different behaviors in people relate to certain emotions. Also, I have learned how to behave based on how I have been taught to act when people are showing the signs of a certain experience or emotion. It takes me a lot of extra thought and time to know how to act empathetic than it probably would be for most NTs who are hardwired to recognize emotions and read social cues more easily. I have learned how to treat people based on their situations because I don't want to hurt them. I may not be able to directly put myself in another's shoes, but I can draw conclusions on what they are experiencing and how they are feeling based on details in their behavior. My brain then processes these details and I can determine how to act on them based on what I have learned.
I think my empathetic ability is all over the place.
Some days I have have too much, which is probably a result of my mood disorder. Sometimes a really high mood can bring up these feelings and knowledge about other people I can't always access.
Sometimes it's hard for me to feel for people even when made aware that I should. A lot of the time I think people just pour on the expressive empathy even when they don't mean it. It's like it's all an act.
Then my affective empathy can be very narrow focused. When it comes to political issues I seem to focus all my attention on issues that directly affect me in some ways when other people are showing concern for those issues that may not even affect them. It's very hard for me to feel for people going through things I don't experience.
I don't actually agree that NT lack empathy compared to autistics. That's just a huge generalization and I'm in a very literal mood right now. If you know every NT on the planet and have a large body of evidence that they do indeed lack more empathy compared to autistic people, then maybe I'll consider it. But I doubt that's the case.
I remember what I was like as a child and I really didn't care about others. Yes, I didn't always realise what was going on with them and that they didn't have a mind that worked exactly like my own. But even now when I'm made aware when I should care it's still very difficult for me to. I didn't even care when my sister's friend committed suicide. I was actually dealing with my own suicidal thoughts so I was a bit preoccupied. Sometimes I just don't care about peoples issues. I don't want to be involved. It could because emotions are overwhelming to me.
I just know times where NT's have more empathy than me, an autistic person I must add. It's more like I focus my attention on very narrow things usually that relate to me. When I care about an issue I'm a very fierce advocate, but when I don't you can tell that I don't. I don't have any opinion for or against. There's no emotion. My fellow activist friends tend to go on about certain issues and they barely phase me. Oh, but mention pension cuts and I'll join right in. It's not like those people are affected by those changes...yet they're so committed to fighting against them it's almost as though it were happening to them. Oh, that's empathy? Right.
Sometimes I'm just too damned honest even if it makes me look like a bad person.
_________________
My band photography blog - http://lostthroughthelens.wordpress.com/
My personal blog - http://helptheywantmetosocialise.wordpress.com/
Yes, people DO say autistic people have no empathy. Not only the general public, but I'm sure you will hear plenty of stories from people here about psychologists, psychiatrists, medical staff, and even some researchers (more in the past) who have thought autistic people have no empathy.
People also used to think autism was caused by "refrigerator mothers". That had no scientific basis, yet was EXTREMELY common. There are plenty of examples in history of people, including well known scientists who had flawed conclusions and studies. These influenced the public's view on everything from mental illness and autism to other diseases and health.
The flawed conclusions, along with the bad studies, are usually outed at a later date like what is happening with autism.
Some say that they do not have empathy because they do not show empathy. Usually they are talking about cognitive empathy and normally they generalize (they can't observe the subjects 24/7 nor read their minds). Even in this forum many aspies comment that they cannot infer what other people think ("think" in the broad sense).
Refrigerator mothers theory was suitable 50 years ago, when the knowlodedge about autism was minimal. And it did have scientific basis.
You cannot invalidate a study beacause you don't like the results.
The OP is talking about the ability to put yourself in one's shoes. People do think we have no empathy, similar to psychopaths.
The refrigerator theory was not valid. It was bad science. You also can't validate anything based one one study. I never said it had anything to do with liking results. You are putting words in my mouth. If you are going to attempt to correct me, it would be nice if you didn't add words I never said or implied.
Some days I have have too much, which is probably a result of my mood disorder. Sometimes a really high mood can bring up these feelings and knowledge about other people I can't always access.
Sometimes it's hard for me to feel for people even when made aware that I should. A lot of the time I think people just pour on the expressive empathy even when they don't mean it. It's like it's all an act.
Then my affective empathy can be very narrow focused. When it comes to political issues I seem to focus all my attention on issues that directly affect me in some ways when other people are showing concern for those issues that may not even affect them. It's very hard for me to feel for people going through things I don't experience.
I don't actually agree that NT lack empathy compared to autistics. That's just a huge generalization and I'm in a very literal mood right now. If you know every NT on the planet and have a large body of evidence that they do indeed lack more empathy compared to autistic people, then maybe I'll consider it. But I doubt that's the case.
I remember what I was like as a child and I really didn't care about others. Yes, I didn't always realise what was going on with them and that they didn't have a mind that worked exactly like my own. But even now when I'm made aware when I should care it's still very difficult for me to. I didn't even care when my sister's friend committed suicide. I was actually dealing with my own suicidal thoughts so I was a bit preoccupied. Sometimes I just don't care about peoples issues. I don't want to be involved. It could because emotions are overwhelming to me.
I just know times where NT's have more empathy than me, an autistic person I must add. It's more like I focus my attention on very narrow things usually that relate to me. When I care about an issue I'm a very fierce advocate, but when I don't you can tell that I don't. I don't have any opinion for or against. There's no emotion. My fellow activist friends tend to go on about certain issues and they barely phase me. Oh, but mention pension cuts and I'll join right in. It's not like those people are affected by those changes...yet they're so committed to fighting against them it's almost as though it were happening to them. Oh, that's empathy? Right.
Sometimes I'm just too damned honest even if it makes me look like a bad person.
If you were replying to my comment about many NTs, also having no empathy, it's true. I didn't say all NTs. I was simply saying that many NTs also have a lack of it just like us. The criteria for ASD is meant to portray what someone one the outside looking at an autistic person would see. Unfortunately, people can misinterpret lack of empathy in autism the same way you could view lack if empathy in a psychopath, which is not 3 x act the same thing. I take it you also put the word experts in quotes because you hear people pretending to be autism experts when they don't know much, huh?
The refrigerator theory was not valid. It was bad science. You also can't validate anything based one one study. I never said it had anything to do with liking results. You are putting words in my mouth. If you are going to attempt to correct me, it would be nice if you didn't add words I never said or implied.
The OP has not made explicit his definition of empathy. I assume that he is talking about recognizing that others have mind, the most basic type of empathy. Psychopaths have good cognitive empathy, but no affective empathy. The oppossite of ASD. "No" is a "black and white" term for lack.
You're calling the regrigerator mother theory "bad science". It was a behavioral description in 1943, when autism was described for first time. Kanner was dealing with something completely unknown. Science has advanced and the theory was refuted. You can't validate science, because the validation method is not valid. You only can refute theories with new theories.
What "people" think is not correct, because they are not experts. And their beliefs are imposed by those who misinterpret the theories. People can't interpret correctly the papers because most of them are not qualified to do so.
What experts think is not correct if they haven't interpreted correcly the information. People have to accept what they say because of what I've just mentioned.
If scientist have personal conflicts with the new theories, that's another problem.
Agree. Experts can't describe what they don't see when they do not know if that existes. Plus, autistic people have described themselves as unempathic because thay do not recognize their own empathy (like you can't infer that you have eyes if you don't look yourself on a mirror). That's another problem.