NiceCupOfTea wrote:
For whatever it's worth, I was barely asked about stims in either of my two assessments for autism.
I know, not everyone has them. I'm asking more for curiosity's sake. It's just that what I do seems to have some of the same quality as others describe in stims.
NiceCupOfTea wrote:
Practically every person in existence performs repetitive movements occasionally, e.g. tapping their fingers, pacing up and down. I wouldn't even count those sort of things as stims; but hand-flapping, rocking or head-banging I would.
What is occasionally though? As I said, I've worked around lots of people and this kind of stuff seems VERY infrequent, and barely noticeable. Compared to myself who spent an hour or so just circling my kitchen this evening, and do this pretty much every day. So can it really just be the be the "odd-ness" of the stim? That doesn't seem like a biological definition, but a subjective clinical one.
Is the feeling of the action the most important aspect? I've heard some say autistic stims are ones you get absorbed by, and I certainly do relate to that.
_________________
Currently being referred for diagnosis.