Gaara wrote:
Atheist. Because looking at the evidence, there is none for any of the 3,000 or so created gods and goddesses and plenty of evidence against.
I find that when taking the term "god" to it's literal definition, there is a rather small amount of empirical evidence (that people would accept, that is) to support the idea.
However, considering how old the texts are in most cases, you also have to take into account that who wrote them may indeed have seen something, but their lack of understanding of modern science would obviously lead them to assume some all-powerful force is behind it all, and there is a TON of evidence to support that idea.
To answer the poll, yes, I consider myself religious, just not so religious as most people. I have my own beliefs and that's good enough for anyone (because my beliefs have nothing to do with anyone else).
Also, I want to state that belief in a religion does not mean you have to give up, or turn off your critical thinking. I find the assertion that you would need to do so, to be distasteful and asinine. Faith in something does NOT require blind belief, nor does it require a lack of critical thinking. For instance, I believe there is something more powerful than I, out there, somewhere. Do I expect it to be some mythical creature? Not necessarily, it could be a supremely advanced and unknown civilization of people for all I know. I personally wonder precisely what it was that made the ancients think they saw god/a god/other ultimate being.
_________________
Writer. Author.