Quote:
Well, you notice I was happy to switch around when the roles were reversed. I don't think I'm above or lower, but based on the roles, one person is supposed to be serving the other. I treat a waiter differently than my dining companion, too - but then, I have been a waitress.
Yeah, I can see that you don't keep the roles rigid, as in you above another person in every context, but the hierarchical thinking is still there in this quote, too. I'm not saying you're wrong and I'm right by any means, just that one person thinks in a hierarchy and the other doesn't. I wouldn't treat the waiter any differently than my companion, except perhaps in terms of familiarity if my companion and I were more familiar with each other. I don't see them as serving me and thus in a lower position. We're just people, in place.
Quote:
Wow now that last remark strikes me as pretty offensive. If someone said, "I am attempting, in simply ignoring and shunning my autistic relative, to illustrate that I won't accommodate their stubborn refusal to deal with their disability by allowing them to stim in my home," this place would be all over you. An elderly relative is someone I would not interrupt, because I feel they are due some deference simply by virtue of their age and secondarily because of their disability.
Not necessarily. If you replace autism there, I think many people would agree that it is not in any way out of line for an NT relative to ask an autistic relative to stop doing something they are doing
voluntarily because it is inappropriate. If you had an autistic relative who constantly talked over everyone, so no one else could speak or have their say, and no one else in the house could ever have a conversation when they were around because they talked over the top of others all the time, would you really just allow them to do so, without raising it and telling them that this was not appropriate? My relative refuses to deal with their disability voluntarily. I'm legally blind without my glasses, for example. This behaviour is like me refusing to wear my glasses, and then expecting people to accommodate me while I constantly run into things and have to be led around by the hand. I wouldn't get away with this, and in my view, neither should my relative.
With the respect issue, I don't afford others more respect based on age or disability, either. I perceive people as equal. I will concede some people need concession due to these things (I walk quickly, but with this elderly relative, I understand they are not as fit as they were and thus, we walk slowly, because this is all their limitations allow, it is it voluntary.) But hierarchical automatic and inherent respect due to age? Nope.
_________________
Alexithymia - 147 points.
Low-Verbal.