I'm not sure if i'm an aspie, but i am average. my iq is 103. (i was severely depressed at that time, so it may not be 100% correct, maybe my iq is actually 105 lol) [oh and i had a difference of viq +20 > piq, though the report said it's normal. but from what i have read it's not and over 10 or 15 (dont remember, sorry) its not normal.]
people on the internet tend to exaggerate their achievements, so i don't really believe everyone, who says they're a genius. i could be bragging how smart i am too, but i prefer to be honest i guess.
really, it's just a number. A FREAKING NUMBER. to be honest, it matters the most when it's very low, i mean the test. because it's used to diagnose intellectual disabilities. but majority of people will score 100 with a standard deviation of 15 i think? so everything in the range 85-115 would be considered average. (sometimes it is different, depends on the age range, test etc)
and majority of people do go on to achieve things. some are harder and more prestigious, but still. everyone values something different. there are so many things that affect someone's achievements...
still, ppl on the internet usually are liars. everyone wants to be seen in the best light and we can't confirm whether that random dude was telling the truth.
and i have actually heard of a person with iq of 70, who studies medicine. dunno, if they will make it, they are 1st year.
and there are aspies with average intelligence, DSM IV says the person has to have average or above average iq, but DSM IV isn't canon anymore (i forgot the word for that i hope u understand what i mean <3). DSM V is more inclusive, as Autism Spectrum Disorder is a broad diagnosis, fitting asperger's, classical autism, some pdds.