Is classic autism worse than Aspergers?

Page 2 of 2 [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,952
Location: Long Island, New York

20 May 2020, 3:35 am

How the loss of Asperger syndrome has lasting repercussions
Sandra Jones is pro vice-chancellor of engagement at Australian Catholic University in Melbourne, Australia.

Quote:
In 2013, the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) — the ‘bible’ for diagnosticians in the United States and Australia — removed Asperger syndrome as a diagnosis separate from autism. In 2019, the World Health Organization followed suit, making the same change in their own diagnostic guidelines, the International Classification of Diseases.

The authors based the change on clinical grounds — noting, for example, inconsistencies in diagnoses —but it has had an impact far beyond the health professionals who are guided by these manuals. What does it mean for people who were diagnosed with Asperger syndrome before the changes were made?

For many, Asperger syndrome is more than a diagnosis. It is an identity. Many people have proudly claimed the term ‘Aspie.’ They have formed support groups, social groups, websites and social-media pages, as well as other physical and virtual spaces, to celebrate their Aspie identity.

Then, suddenly they are no longer Aspies, according to prevailing clinical wisdom. They are autistic.

For some, who saw the distinction as artificial and creating barriers between groups of people on the spectrum, it has been a welcome change. For others, however, it has been a distressing removal of their identity and, they say, potentially a new barrier to getting much-needed support.

Research has not yet definitively shown whether these changes have had an impact on autistic people’s access to supports and services, but in the meantime, scientists and people on the spectrum need to work together to ensure that concerns about access and stigma are addressed, and that the challenges and strengths of autistic people are recognized and supported.

First-person accounts:
Research on this shift in diagnostic criteria has been limited, predominantly conducted in the United States and done using secondary analyses of online discussions. So my research student and I sought to understand the impact of these changes firsthand, through 12 in-depth interviews with Australian adults who had been diagnosed with Asperger syndrome under a previous edition of the DSM1.

We interviewed three women and nine men, aged 22 to 69 years. Six were employed; two were self-employed; one was seeking work; and one was student. Two received a disability support pension from the Australian government. Five had been diagnosed in childhood or adolescence, and seven as adults.

We analyzed our interview transcripts in the context of disability identity theory. Disability identity is a specific form of identity thought to alleviate some of the stress associated with minority-group membership and discrimination, and to provide a sense of belonging and validation2,3.

Half of our participants expressed mixed feelings about the change in diagnostic categories. The two women who were diagnosed as adults perceived ‘autism’ and ‘Asperger syndrome’ as interchangeable and were comfortable with either identity. The three young men diagnosed with Asperger syndrome in childhood felt that the change was positive. To them, the autism spectrum has always included Aspies, and the change is a recognition of the diversity of autistic people.

The sixth, a man diagnosed in adulthood, was ambivalent about the change but skeptical about the motivation. All six people were concerned, however, that the change could have an impact on access to services — for example, they questioned whether people who would have met the diagnostic criteria for Asperger syndrome but not for autism would lose valuable supports. They also felt, as did everyone interviewed, that there is more stigma attached to an autism diagnosis than to an Asperger syndrome diagnosis:

“I think that people will look at it differently, like, that person is autistic, so they’ve got certain needs … I guess it does have to stay in the DSM, but I’d like them to change the title of that and say it’s not just psychiatric disorders, because then people think it is, and it’s not.”

“Like I think, there are advantages, because it does kind of acknowledge there are different … that it is a spectrum. Very different people on the spectrum. That’s a good label. … And then there are some times where I feel like using that word, like autism, using that kind of ‘disorder,’ as much as the label is good, it’s also bad. In that it provokes a lot of negative emotions in some people.”


Diverse views:
Three of the participants, all men who were diagnosed as adults, were strongly opposed to the change. They felt their original diagnosis had brought them a sense of identity and acceptance. All three saw Asperger syndrome as a unique condition and the change as threatening their valued identity. They view Asperger syndrome as fundamentally different from autism:

“It just comes back to that stigma. Being willing to identify as … instead of saying Asperger’s, as autism spectrum disorder. A mouthful of a word, which no one understands.”

“… A lot of adults on the spectrum needed and relied on the term ‘Aspie’ from Asperger’s syndrome as an identity. And now that that’s been removed, a lot of adults are disadvantaged, because we don’t have an identity.”

The three remaining interviewees who were strongly in favor of the change identified with the broader autism community. They saw the previous separation between autism and Asperger syndrome as semantics, and the combination of diagnoses as bringing people together to share their strengths and supports:

“I think by the end of it, just having, instead of having multiple little definitions, having just one big definition, a broad range of conditions, is probably more useful than just having very specific ones, because people can be misdiagnosed or in those little pigeon holes.”

“Absolutely. It’ll become an antiquated term, to be an Aspie, whatever, it’ll become an old term. But yeah, absolutely fine with it. Doesn’t, I thought it was good when I heard it. I thought, ‘Oh, good. Because it used to be ASD and Asperger’s, and I thought no, they’re the same.”

The diversity of opinions in this small group reflects wider ongoing conversations about the changes to diagnostic manuals that have erased Asperger syndrome as a label. Pragmatic concerns around the more constrained criteria include the potential for people to miss out on a diagnosis or to be unable to access appropriate services.

Each of the DSM editions over the past six decades has included changes to the criteria and categorization of autism. Changes to diagnostic categories and ‘labels’ have a significant impact on the identity of individuals and social networks. Hopefully, whatever terminology researchers and people on the spectrum adopt in the future — whether it is consistent with or different from the actual diagnostic categories — will serve to bring us together to advocate for and support the needs of all autistic people.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


StimWithMe
Butterfly
Butterfly

Joined: 5 Mar 2019
Gender: Female
Posts: 15
Location: Blanket Fort

20 May 2020, 4:30 am

Glflegolas wrote:
I guess the only answer to the original question is that it depends on the individual.

A large component of the distinction between classic autism and asperger's is based on the ability to speak, or lack thereof.

Yet in many cases sensory issues can be far more debilitating than the lack of ability to speak.

I, along with many others, am not entirely sure how useful functioning labels are. An individuals functioning can change so much throughout life that giving them a functioning label may do more harm than good.

This is especially true when diagnosing young children. Sure, it's possible to diagnose an 18-month old with autism... but how reliably can you extrapolate how much support that individual is going to need as an adult? Not very.

Finally, I'll leave you with this: An article describing childhood diagnosis in Psychology Today.


My assessor said that functioning labels are fluid, and can change over time. That might be why reassessment is a thing.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

20 May 2020, 5:30 am

Jon: It was rarely expressed to me, by my parents (and never by my brother) that my acquiring speech at age 5 was “remarkable.”

I didn’t know what a clinician was when I was 5.



firemonkey
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,648
Location: Calne,England

20 May 2020, 6:32 am

There are too many possible permutations for me to say whether it's always worse or not .

Using the levels in the DSM

ASD 1
ASD 1 + dyspraxia
ASD 1 + psychosis
ASD 1 + epilepsy
ASD 1 + ADHD
ASD 1 + learning difficulty
etc etc etc

My opinion is that ASD often comes with co-morbids, and a proper appraisal of functioning and needs should involve the whole package not just the ASD.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

20 May 2020, 6:34 am

It’s “worse” if one has difficulty functioning within their milieu.

It’s “better” if there’s less difficulty functioning.

Regardless of the diagnosis.



firemonkey
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,648
Location: Calne,England

20 May 2020, 6:42 am

Is attempting things and whether the person fails or succeeds a good guide to functioning? How about those that haven't failed much , but that's because they lead rather basic and limited lifestyles .



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

20 May 2020, 6:50 am

What you said is a confirmation that an assessment of “functioning” is an individual matter.

There are many variables to consider.



cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

20 May 2020, 8:03 pm

Archmage Arcane wrote:
I don't agree with the reclassification in DSM-5 and no therapist or neuropsych I've ever met does either.

I still consider Asperger's and classic autism as different conditions. There are various drawbacks common to both. There seem to be more advantages to Asperger's, but being sufficiently 'high-functioning' so 'you don't look autistic' is a major drawback in and of itself.


I think the boffins are saying the same collection of genes result in Aspergers and classic Autism but for some individuals there are either more genes switched off or on during development resulting in more profound changes that impact function.

It's a little like auto-electrical problems in a car. Mechanics know to diagnose a fault as Auto-electrical (and not something else) but some cars might just have a faulty indicator whereas other's the front lights might not work properly and in some the alternator can't work etc etc....



Jakki
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2019
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,957
Location: Outter Quadrant

20 May 2020, 8:13 pm

my opinion is that Kraftie has a very accurate description . And seems to have a good intelligence on his perceptions of Classic Autism . Have followed his contributions here for a long while.


_________________
Diagnosed hfa
Loves velcro,
Quote:
where ever you go ,there you are


cyberdad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,036

20 May 2020, 8:52 pm

The questions of function is relative to personal perception and societal expectations....