IQ check....whats yours and do you believe its correct?

Page 2 of 3 [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

psychotic
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 212
Location: Floating through space

20 Aug 2007, 12:34 pm

mmaestro wrote:
Haven't done a proper one since I was 15, out of a book. It was the first of 3, and the early one was weighted to give more accurate results between 100 and 130, with the highest possible score as 138. I went off the scale for that, and it only took me 45 minutes for the hour long test. Other internet stuff has pegged me in the high 120s generally, but I'm out of practice with the math stuff, so I'd expect to do worse than I did at school. I'm guessing if I started getting back into studying logic puzzles, I could push my scores up pretty high. My dad used to be a math teacher, and he'd teach his students how to think to increase their IQ scores. He said you could usually push someone's score up by 10 points if they were willing to put the work in.

which shows that IQ is a joke!



the_falling_frog
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 36

20 Aug 2007, 12:38 pm

I'm willing to bet that you can boost your score by way more than 10 points just by taking some math classes, as it forces you to visualize geometrical forms. Also the analogies and word games always fall into certain patterns which, if you're prepared for them, become much easier. So I really don't think that IQ tests measure very much except how much you like math. I took a couple online tests and scored 125 and 145, but I consider those scores to be very inaccurate.

Besides, talent only gets you so far and IQ is supposed to be a measure of talent, as far as I can tell. The only way to excel in something is to work very hard, and that's true no matter what your IQ is. Which is a comforting thought in my mind since no matter who you are, there's always somebody out there with a higher IQ, but with enough focus you can still be the best at what you love to do.



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

20 Aug 2007, 1:03 pm

125 on one test, 140 on another; both were on the internet.

I think the IQ test is pretty close to meaningless; my generation (gen Xers), for instance, tends to score 10-20 points higher than the generation before: probably because we grew up taking standardized exams in school and have learned test-taking skills that our parents didn't have. Gen Ys will probably score higher yet, but I doubt that the average intelligence level is actually increasing.

Also, it's been shown that some forms of the test are biased towards white male experience: questions about baseball stats, etc. If you throw in inner-city specific questions, inner-city kids start scoring higher. If you throw in woman-focused questions, women start scoring higher (those being, of course, generalizations).



Griff
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,312

20 Aug 2007, 1:09 pm

I dunno. The near-lack of hunger or real danger allows for lower cortisol levels. With less cortisol in there to destroy our brains, some of us are apt to grow to be remarkably intelligent. Prosperity breeds advancement, I'm thinking. Of course, it also kills the selective factor and allows for really weird disorders to start manifesting, but still...



LostInSpace
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,617
Location: Dixie

20 Aug 2007, 1:37 pm

Griff wrote:
I dunno. The near-lack of hunger or real danger allows for lower cortisol levels. With less cortisol in there to destroy our brains, some of us are apt to grow to be remarkably intelligent. Prosperity breeds advancement, I'm thinking. Of course, it also kills the selective factor and allows for really weird disorders to start manifesting, but still...


What about people with excessive levels of anxiety, as many ASD people have? Wouldn't they have higher levels of cortisol? The sources of worry may be different in modern society, but they can be just as potent, neurologically speaking.



bizmack
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 221
Location: San Diego

20 Aug 2007, 1:44 pm

Griff wrote:
I don't really know, and I don't think that an IQ test could ever tell the whole story. I spend so much time in a serotonin haze that my mind is unfocused most of the time, but my mind also has remarkable capabilities. What I can do depends entirely upon what you ask me to do. I can do amazing things if I'm applied correctly. I'm a shapeshifter of sorts. If caught on the wrong day, I'd flunk a personality test. On a good day...sky's the limit.


I know exactly what you mean...I can remember taking a state test back when I was a junior in high school and placing in the top percentile in the state while finishing the class with a C-
I think both laziness and anxiety tend to shape my academic outcome


_________________
the conventional view serves to protect society from the painful job of thinking.


Diamonddavej
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 530
Location: Ireland

20 Aug 2007, 1:51 pm

70% of people believe that their IQ is above the average, which mean that 20% of people are sadly mistaken.

Mine is 138 (top 1%), MENSA 1995. It is better to express your IQ in % terms, as there are so many different IQ scales.

IQ is a poor measure of achievement. Richard Feynman had an IQ of 124. Also, I think Aspies can have average IQ but still achieve a gifted level of achievement in their special area of interest, where all their time and thoughts are concentrated. NTs interests are more spread out, Aspies have concentrated splinter skills. A bit like this graphic.

Image



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

20 Aug 2007, 2:02 pm

I just took a couple--one I scored 131, and another 132. I don't really know what these numbers mean--I guess that I am reasonably intelligent, but not a super-genius.



Aradford
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 447
Location: Canada

20 Aug 2007, 2:06 pm

Perceiving that the standard IQ test is completely constructed and geared towards the conforming intellectual standards of society I see no point in taking it; however, I feel that I would be above 150.



TheMachine1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,011
Location: 9099 will be my last post...what the hell 9011 will be.

20 Aug 2007, 2:07 pm

Diamonddavej wrote:
IQ is a poor measure of achievement.


Yeah I had a thread on the subject.

http://www.wrongplanet.net/modules.php? ... ghlight=iq



Griff
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,312

20 Aug 2007, 2:31 pm

LostInSpace wrote:
Griff wrote:
I dunno. The near-lack of hunger or real danger allows for lower cortisol levels. With less cortisol in there to destroy our brains, some of us are apt to grow to be remarkably intelligent. Prosperity breeds advancement, I'm thinking. Of course, it also kills the selective factor and allows for really weird disorders to start manifesting, but still...


What about people with excessive levels of anxiety, as many ASD people have? Wouldn't they have higher levels of cortisol?
No. Absolutely not, at least not necessarily. Most auties and Aspies tend to have much lower levels of cortisol than most people. There are different forms of anxiety, and not all of them are caused by high cortisol levels. I'm sure that some Aspies have high cortisol levels, but it's doubtful that this is the trend. The only cases in which I can conceive of high cortisol levels would be those in which a great deal of nerve damage is occuring due to excitoxicity. Even that wouldn't necessarily mean high cortisol levels overall, just a greater vulnerability of the brain to its degenerative, anxiety-inducing effects.

Quote:
The sources of worry may be different in modern society, but they can be just as potent, neurologically speaking.
Yes and no. Although there may be a lot of sources of stress in modern society, the stress-inducing, fat-storing effects of cortisol are not as likely to provide a survival advantage. I could be wrong, though. This is still mysterious turf for me.



Ticker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2006
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,955

20 Aug 2007, 2:41 pm

I haven't been tested since my school years. But I tested at 165 on the Stanford-Binet.



LostInSpace
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,617
Location: Dixie

20 Aug 2007, 2:47 pm

Diamonddavej wrote:
Mine is 138 (top 1%), MENSA 1995. It is better to express your IQ in % terms, as there are so many different IQ scales.


99.9th percentile then.



skyblu
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 19 Aug 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 17
Location: Prescott, AZ

20 Aug 2007, 3:06 pm

i took just an online IQ test and i kept getting around 140 but this is off certain meds i was taking. on the meds i was quite low :(
scary!? 8O :x

another related topic is Mensa members. My sister in law scored high enough to join mensa; but she is taken in by so many scams its strange, however she is bipolar so im sure this could have some negative effect-- uh is that a DUH? or is "bipolarism" not related to gullibility? and/or is IQ not related to gullibility? so how much does IQ have a positive effect on individuals? what if you suffered financial setbacks related to medical problems yet your IQ causes you to be bored at your job?is medication in order in that situation?



:lol: :D


_________________
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Einstein
"The heart has its reasons that reason does not know"
Blaise Pascal
Pensées


Saerain
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 80
Location: Rhode Island, USA

20 Aug 2007, 5:21 pm

I have scored 98, 109, and 139 in three different types of IQ tests. I score higher when there is less emphasis on mathematics, my Achilles' Heel, my Kryptonite.


_________________
'I don't know if that's an Asperger's thing or not, I think it's just being reasonable.' - Bram Cohen


2ukenkerl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,242

20 Aug 2007, 6:16 pm

Well, when I was 10, I took a test and tested 154. Frankly, I didn't even care enough to do my best. I keep meaning to ask my mother if she still has records from the time I saw that psychiatrist, when I was 6, because of my social deficiencies. That would be interesting, as they tested me a lot.

At the time, I certainly wasn't surprised. I never studied, and I STILL did very well. I got As and later only some Bs.

TODAY, I don't feel nearly as smart, although I still test well, but a LOT of people seem pretty stupid, so it still kind of balances out.