I do not know why they included the label of A.S with what had happened, though I was not really partaking here at the time. Seems as though awareness like with Dr. Phil has got some negative publicity, the label is not the person really, so it makes people diagnosed with it seem criminal or bad perhaps by some.
It is perhaps understood as the label being the sociological archetype, there are stereotypes and stigmas, then the reality of the individual.
“Some might be like this, didn’t that guy who shot someone have A.S, then people might become fearful. Yet I think there is better subjective logics in most then that.
Furthering a truthful awareness of A.S.D's including A.S especially in the social service system might help individuals be less confused and better assisted whom are depressed enough to do such things. Yet criminalism such as this has little to do with the label and more about the subjective reality of the individual instead of the diagnostic groupings.
I have little detail concerning the circumstances of the person who happened to have A.S who commited the crimes.