KBerg wrote:
Sometimes I find it laughable that a mere word can describe an emotion. When I'm angry anger isn't something that covers it, it's such a tiny word, it has no nuances, no subtleties to it. It's just five letters, five letters people use when they've gotten beaten up, or when someone stepped on their shoes, or failure to understand what 'hold the pickle' meant at the burger place. It seems absurd that something so small, used for so many different varied situations can express something as deep and complex as what I'm feeling.
But I feel it all the same. It just seems wrong somehow to minimize what I feel when I consider say my career situation to the same level, the same word, that I might use for finding a pickle on my burger after I specifically asked them to hold it. And NT's wonder why I struggle with this. They use the same words for everything regardless of magnitude. No wonder I can't use their words, the way they use them is as absurd as a painter calling everything from the lightest aqua to the deepest indigo 'blue'. How can I be expected to distinguish shades of my own emotions when they themselves use happy for everything from 'mildly pleased' to 'elated'?
I use different words than most. I tend to use words that describe my energy level, since I don't find the common emotion words adequate. The pickle incident might make me "irritated". My career situation might be "profoundly distressing".
"content or just okay", "irritated","agitated/stressed","distressing","very distressing"
Some people don't like this but I find it more accurate for the way my body acts.