hyperlexian wrote:
Cornflake wrote:
i see, so it seems it is advantageous as it allows someone to claim land that is not their own. not so much a necessity as a strategy? or am i misunderstanding?
In many cases it's more like claiming land or property having no discernible owner, or where a known owner has intentionally abandoned it.
It's laughable that a council should somehow forget about their own property for 12 years. No wait: it's criminal, and much more so than someone moving into it and renovating it.
In these types of cases I fully support the actions of the squatters.
I'm not sure how frequent are the cases of families going away for two weeks and on returning, find their house has been taken over by umm, "a bunch of hippies". Very rare indeed, I should think - but in
this type of case, the squatters have no rights - and the law recognises this.
It's
not the case that anyone can just stroll into a house and say "this is now mine", and make it stick.
_________________
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.