Kail wrote:
Why should anyone care about you then?
No reason. Then again, I don't expect anyone else to care about me; yet here you are, caring enough about me to respond to one of my posts. Thank you. Thank you very much.
Kail wrote:
Where do you get off thinking your opinion is most important?
I don't. Where do you get off assuming that I do?
Kail wrote:
Care to enlighten me on your interests? I'm sure you won't enjoy me bashing them.
Care to read through all of my 10,000-plus posts and determine them for yourself?
Kail wrote:
Your already going to die, and it's not like your going to be a genius anytime soon.
My I.Q. is in excess of 140 (circa 2009), as measured by a trained and licensed mental-health professional.
Kail wrote:
No, you can give but you can't take?
Another false assumption. I've "taken it" from an alcoholic father, a pill-popping ex-wife, three drill instructors, numerous commissioned officers, lawyers, police, judges, union thugs, and the occasional schizophrenic homeless person. If I can "take it" from them, then I can "take it" from you.
Face it, kid. Not everyone agrees with the idea of speculating about dead people. Even fewer seem to agree with the idea of labeling dead people with syndromes and disorders that they were never diagnosed as having while they were alive.
_________________
The previous signature line has been cancelled.