Autistic survival guide and competition among women
I just read the "Autistic survival guide on wikibooks: " http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/A_survival ... c_spectrum
An interesting read. There were a few insights that were new to me, but overall it left me with more questions than answers.
One thing I was wondering about was the section on the "social status game", which was very central to the whole world view, and seemed more applicable to men or at least to young, single people. Although the way it describes the "game" seems accurate in general, the "goal" given doesn't seem to fully explain its prevalence:
"By being popular with, and "acquiring" potential partners, one has achieved the primary goal of the social status game, and therefore has little need to build further status."
This doesn't make sense to me because in my experience married NT women are very interested in playing "social status games" with other women. If anything, they seem more interested in it than single NT women (who seem more focused on directly "catching" a good man). The status games women play seem to exist on a separate plane from mating, or rather, while having a desirable man increases one's status among other women, increasing status with other women does nothing to help one get a desirable man. It seems to me there are different techniques for that, possibly easier ones for aspie women to figure out, as they require less sophisticated social skills than the female status games do.
I have my own guess as to why this is in terms of instinct - higher social status can be passed on to one's children, basically, so women who are partnered fall into the social category of mothers (even if they aren't actually mothers) and compete for the sake of their children's or potential children's interests. I'm not sure, though., I'm interested in hearing other people's ideas about this topic. What is the purpose of social status games among women? How do they change when women find a partner/have children?
On a more personal note, how can someone like me (married mom in my 30's) interact with other women in a way that doesn't lead to conflict? I keep finding myself in situations where other women my age are aggressive (insulting or backstabbing) for no apparent reason. They seem to see me as an enemy, though I actually have no desire to harm them in any way. I'm just not that interested in socializing because it exhausts me, and that seems to come across as an insult or attack of some kind. Has anyone else found any "tricks" for dealing with these sorts of interactions?
I bolded what I think is absolutely true. I noticed an intensity I had never encountered before (inlcuding highschool) in this status wrangling once I had a kid old enough for preschool. But in fact that higher status can be passed on to one's children almost immediately via admission to certain schools and certain programs. Depending on where you are, the competition for these admissions can be very intense and the children can be judged by their parents- thus the social status competitions. I don't live in New York City but the competition for favored schools is pretty intense and the social status games are legendary because of that. They are said to be the fiercest in the world. I wouldn't want to raise a child in New York City for that reason alone. I am just not good enough at that sort of wrangling.
Socialize on the most superficial level possible. If you don't socialize at all, the other moms may get an amorphous "dread" feeling that you could be a threat to their kid somehow (or a threat to their kid's status, which is the same thing). Maybe you're best friends with the school superintendent and will displace their kid in the Gifted and Talented class. Maybe you are a land developer and are working with local government to raze their favorite playground. I realize these are silly examples. They won't necessarily even have concrete examples in their heads. Just a "dread" feeling. Superficial socializing is like holding up your hands to show you aren't armed. Not socializing at all is like keeping your hands behind your back, possibly concealing a weapon.
Be careful when superficially socializing not to disagree with the other women.
I generally don't socialize-- I alway forget to be careful and end up making some error that puts me on "permanent outcast, don't even let your kids play with hers" status. I notice one mistake I make is giving a wrong response or a contradictory response and thus showing that I'm not like them.
My rule is "Speak when spoken to; answer as vaguely as you can with as few words as possible."
But, don't take advice from me. Because I have a rule about social status games. I try to be aware that they are going on, because I don't want to be so blindsided by them that I do something stupid like be myself and get my kids outcast again. But I absolutely do not play, and I don't hang out with people who do.
Too bad for my kids. I've got three daughters.
_________________
"Alas, our dried voices when we whisper together are quiet and meaningless, as wind in dry grass, or rats' feet over broken glass in our dry cellar." --TS Eliot, "The Hollow Men"
daydreamer84
Veteran
Joined: 8 Jul 2009
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,001
Location: My own little world
I generally don't socialize-- I alway forget to be careful and end up making some error that puts me on "permanent outcast, don't even let your kids play with hers" status. I notice one mistake I make is giving a wrong response or a contradictory response and thus showing that I'm not like them.
My rule is "Speak when spoken to; answer as vaguely as you can with as few words as possible."
But, don't take advice from me. Because I have a rule about social status games. I try to be aware that they are going on, because I don't want to be so blindsided by them that I do something stupid like be myself and get my kids outcast again. But I absolutely do not play, and I don't hang out with people who do.
Too bad for my kids. I've got three daughters.
This is just a sad thread. It makes me think the world is just a terrible place to be for people like us. Janissy's explanation makes sense and if people have an instinct and feel threatened when , in this case, other mum's don't socialize with them or socialize with them in an odd way (differently) then it's not really their fault that they try to protect themselves or their kids from the potential threat they sense intuitively. Then again, it certainly isn't your fault because you're just born with different instincts or without certain ones and you socialize in a different way and it's not your kids' fault but they have to suffer because of it and not have a chance to make friends with the other kids.
I suppose I (we) should focus more on putting other women at ease. That's a difficult frame of mind to get into when you have a history of being bullied by them, though. I also wonder how NT's are able to pull off the superficially warm & friendly demeanor when they certainly know how dangerous the social game can be, but it doesn't seem to faze them at all.
It is a dilemma. I proceed in a way similar to BuyerBeware, with short and vague answers. It is lengthy specificity that is the most hazardous since you are bound to say something that twangs their "alert!" antennae. Short and vague is your best bet. It's what I do.
It's in general incredible that people can accept and appreciate living such a, in my eyes, fake life (i.e. always pretending - never just living).
But I see you have to, if you want to survive.
Social skills are much about pretending in my eyes. It's fake to me, and that's why I don't like it.
little_black_sheep
Snowy Owl
Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 132
Location: Up in Space
Same problem here. I don't play any social games and I try to be nice and kind to anyone. I even try to do some small talk when I feel up to it, but mostly I am too shy to approach anyone. However, I have never done anything to conciously harm anyone else. Still, other women seem to see a constant threat in me.
Just yesterday a female colleague told me that she doesn't know me, because I don't chat as much with all the other colleagues as I should (I don't because I am so scared of her...) and that this is why she doesn't trust me and doesn't want me to be there. O.o I don't get it. I tried to remain nice even after her behaviour became more and more hostile and at times aggressive. She likes to yell at me whenever I am around and tells bad stuff about me.
I hardly ever have these problems with men, but whenever I inquired why a certain girl/woman hates me (happens quite often) it ended in someone telling me that she feels threatened by me. BY ME??? Who can understand NTs? I am certainly the least threatening person they will ever meet. They should worry about all those ambitious, chatty women who are just waiting for a good story to pass on.
_________________
Every morning in Africa, an antelope wakes up. It knows it must outrun the fastest lion, or it will be killed. Every morning in Africa, a lion wakes up. It knows it must run faster than the slowest antelope, or it will starve. It doesn't matter if you're
btbnnyr
Veteran
Joined: 18 May 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,359
Location: Lost Angleles Carmen Santiago
Kjas
Veteran
Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,059
Location: the place I'm from doesn't exist anymore
An interesting read. There were a few insights that were new to me, but overall it left me with more questions than answers.
One thing I was wondering about was the section on the "social status game", which was very central to the whole world view, and seemed more applicable to men or at least to young, single people. Although the way it describes the "game" seems accurate in general, the "goal" given doesn't seem to fully explain its prevalence:
"By being popular with, and "acquiring" potential partners, one has achieved the primary goal of the social status game, and therefore has little need to build further status."
This doesn't make sense to me because in my experience married NT women are very interested in playing "social status games" with other women. If anything, they seem more interested in it than single NT women (who seem more focused on directly "catching" a good man). The status games women play seem to exist on a separate plane from mating, or rather, while having a desirable man increases one's status among other women, increasing status with other women does nothing to help one get a desirable man. It seems to me there are different techniques for that, possibly easier ones for aspie women to figure out, as they require less sophisticated social skills than the female status games do.
I have my own guess as to why this is in terms of instinct - higher social status can be passed on to one's children, basically, so women who are partnered fall into the social category of mothers (even if they aren't actually mothers) and compete for the sake of their children's or potential children's interests. I'm not sure, though., I'm interested in hearing other people's ideas about this topic. What is the purpose of social status games among women? How do they change when women find a partner/have children?
On a more personal note, how can someone like me (married mom in my 30's) interact with other women in a way that doesn't lead to conflict? I keep finding myself in situations where other women my age are aggressive (insulting or backstabbing) for no apparent reason. They seem to see me as an enemy, though I actually have no desire to harm them in any way. I'm just not that interested in socializing because it exhausts me, and that seems to come across as an insult or attack of some kind. Has anyone else found any "tricks" for dealing with these sorts of interactions?
There is one book called Girl Wars by Cheryl Dellasega - it explains a lot of things, as well as steps to take.
Although it's written for pre-teens and teenage girls, most of the stuff in there is applicable to adult women to - the only difference is that they become more subtle at it, and the goalposts of what "social status" is changes, as they date, have careers, get married and have children.
_________________
Diagnostic Tools and Resources for Women with AS: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt211004.html
This is the type of social interaction that goes right over my head. I would have no clue I was being scrutinized. Just as well, my kid seems to have aspergers too so it's not like we already won't be "outcasts". I wouldn't want to associate with people like that anyway. They can take their status symbol kids and cars right on down the road. Buh bye.
Humans find you most threatening and will attack the most when they can't pigeon-hole you. So being short and vague is exactly what you shouldn't do. You have to give them something as early and as convincing as possible that makes them think they got your number. Be emphatic and sound totally convinced of whatever stupid little box you want them to believe you live in. Something like "...and I say, if you're not going to cook a fresh meal for your family morning and night, then don't form one!" so they think they have pigeon-holed you in the "little housewife" box. Doesn't matter which hole you choose to portray, as long as it's convincing and empty-headed.
_________________
There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats - Albert Schweitzer
PrncssAlay
Deinonychus
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 321
Location: Midwest, Southwest, Northwest, California
It took me almost my whole lifetime (up to this point) to figure this out, but hey, it works! Think in terms of projecting a benign image. In the past I basically just tried to stay under the radar but in a small town that doesn't work. If people have to "fill in the blanks" they most likely will imagine negative intent.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Looking for old autistic guide website I forgot. |
14 Oct 2024, 4:45 pm |
Competition |
26 Sep 2024, 7:50 pm |
Women's pronouns |
20 Nov 2024, 3:16 pm |
Where to meet women irl who are single |
07 Dec 2024, 12:25 am |