RainKing wrote:
equinn wrote:
My idea is that a misperception or misreading of rules, or others intentions, could cause a child or adult to assume one thing when actually it's something else entirely. The person acts on the percieved understanding and then in defense of actions appears to be lying because, after all, no one could be that naive.
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
Wait, what? Who is who in your post?
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
Sorry "The person (with AS) acts on the percieved understanding....
get it?
example: Adults says to child "We can't eat donuts until after lunch." AS hears "we can have donuts with our lunch" and so he puts one on his plate. He is accused of being sneaky, not following rules and in defense, he says so and so said we could have donuts. (seems to be lying in order to get the donut)--small example.
Another example is when child/adult with AS mispercieves the tone and accuses said person of speaking violently or in a threatening manner to him/her--when in fact, this is not the case. The accused is irrate at this accusation and jumps to the defensive, and child/adult with AS gains a reputation of falsifying information. Meanwhile, AS individual is left confused as to what he/she did wrong. Eventually, as the child matures, he/she will become paranoid or feel that others are disbelieveing him/her (as you mention in your post).
The child, especially, might lie intentionally because this is what's expected of him/her and so he/she will do it even if it's wrong in order to meet that expectation. They are unsure about how to discern intentions so this could lead to a negative pattern of behavior.
equinn