I was really surprised that I got 30 on that test... Either it was a fluke or I'm somehow a lot better at judging people's feelings by just the eyes than when I have lots of extra information to work with. The extra info may just confuse me.
elderwanda wrote:
I don't much care for this kind of test, though. For one thing, these are obviously actors. So whatever they are feeling, they are acting, and some actors are better than others. For many if not most of them, the ego is always there. The actresses in those older movies were almost always supposed to be sexy and seductive at all time, on top of whatever other emotion they were portraying, and that makes things confusing. Anyway, these aren't people in real settings, but on a movie set, acting. Also, we're looking at still images, and just the eyes.
My guess as to the way this test was created. Yes these are actors, however, I'm seeing the test being done in two passes. The first pass they ask people to write down a word, instead of asking multiple choice. This first pass is not for the purpose of testing people's ability to judge, it's for determining what the average response is on each individual image, which is different than the average response for the test as a whole. Then they drop out any specific images for which the responses aren't predictable enough to produce a common answer and that gives them the set they use for the actual test.
So at that point in theory the fact that they are acting shouldn't make as much difference, because your answer is being compared to the original set of unrestrained answers from the first pass -- in other words, what the average person thinks the eyes are saying, not what the experimenter asked the actor to create. The final score would be a measure of how often your answer matches the average person's answer. The reason why the average NT's total score is 26 is because there's a certain amount of variance across the set of images, as opposed to on a specific image. IoW the average person will produce a non-average response on slightly less than 1/3rd of the images (which specific images vary). So a person who gets a really high score in theory is really good at judging how the average NT will judge each image in the set.
I also felt like I was guessing on a lot of them or that none of the answers were a good fit. And I also used the angle of the face, height of the lids or eyebrows, etc as the majority of my information. The eyeballs themselves don't really say much imo.