Am I the only one on here bothered by this?
Should the person with A.S. be punished, by having them work harder to gain respect through aptitude, in a workplace that will not respect them socially, or should those ignorant, intolerant and prejudiced people be the ones who should pay, contributing towards people living without working, because they will for no good reason, not accept those people in the working environment?
the problem with this argument is that you seem to think it's only applied to Autistic folks; dude, welcome to the world: 100 years ago, Blacks were going thru the same thing, and other minorities even before that, in many cases even thru that time.
It's nothing new.
Ever hear of a little incident that happened in Little Rock, Arkansas?
Humans are always persecuting other humans; it's all they really know how to do: scapegoat each other cause they don't understand anything dramatically better....yet, anyway.
Dude.......Thats what this thread is about.....
There is a simple yes or no answer. You either do or you don't. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to work it out
It's you making into a bigger argument to suit your soap box. Open a new thread imo if you want to argue your political views.
Peace ellomo
Dude.......Thats what this thread is about.....
Peace ellomo
No, the thread is about if anyone is bothered by the idea of Autistic folks going on the taxpayer's dollar/SSID, not if workplaces specifically discriminate against us.
Society discriminates against everybody; always have, always will.
Well, I'll tell ya:
if there's one thing I've learned in life( and believe me, I've learned quite a bit), it's that everyone is good at doing at least one thing. In most cases, they exceed expectations at whatever it is.
Now, I'm not suggesting someone who's handicapped from the waist down attempt to run the NYC Marathon or become an Olympic gymnast like say...Mary Lou Retton.
but if you're good at something, rather than collecting federal paychecks due to all the things you can't do, try making a living off something you can do.
More braindead idealism. Being good at something doesn't automatically mean you will find someone willing to pay you for said talent. 99% if people with a talent pursue their talent as a hobby. Their job is just to get money so they can get by in life.
You can't ignore the fact that some are discriminated against more than others (and I'm not saying that autistics have it worse than every other group, so don't even think that).
How has the standard of living gone up in China? There are 2 billion people there, and riots at the moment because there are millions and millions of people who are working in Dickensian factories like slaves for long hours and very small pay. Yes a few rich there are richer... but a lot of people dont see that as a measure of a good standard of living, when the average person does not have it very good.
I'm sorry, but I don't think you can find any metric by which the standard of living has not been improving in China. Yes there are people working for hardly anything, but there are far fewer of these people now than in the past.
http://www.thehumanaught.com/blog/gener ... of-living/
http://factsanddetails.com/china.php?it ... ubcatid=60
Thats not what I have heard at all. It is an extremely large country with a lot of poor people, though people are not as poor as in India. Living costs are low, but housing conditions are poor for many people. I dont thnk it is a place you would want to be poor, especially in the winter.
There's a difference between 'good' and 'improving', you know! You can't just snap your fingers and have billions of people who were living in abject poverty suddenly have a standard of living like that which we enjoy in the US. The point is that Chinese people are starting to escape from this poverty for the first time in history, thanks to economic reforms returning them to the free market. Everything you posted just goes to show how bad things were over there before the 80s!
I hate the way threads like this turn into political platforms...
I'm only going to address the OP here.
Blasty, you are, what? 25 years old now? Let me know in about thirty years whether you feel the same as you do now.
I'll be fifty in about two months. I've NEVER before played the AS or Autism "card," but I'm about to. Why? Because I've spent my entire LIFE beating my head against brick walls trying to do what you've been doing, and for a long time been somewhat successful at it. After many temporary burn-outs and restarts, I've finally decided I've had enough.
Is it wrong for me to make that decision now? Should I wait until I'm 55? 60? 70? 75?
How many years am I supposed to keep trying to fit into a society I'm not wired for? How many more times should I beat my head against unyielding walls?
I'm now seeking a diagnosis so I can finally take advantage of programs I have NO access to and never have. I have AS, I'm positive of it. All I need is for the right doctor to confirm it. My wife very likely has it, or is at least on the spectrum. My oldest son, though he tested on the spectrum, could not get a diagnosis by the doctor that tested him. My other two sons are diagnosed on the spectrum, one with AS and the other with PDD-NOS.
Do you have any idea what it's like to be on the spectrum, married to someone who probably is too, and raising three kids who ARE on the spectrum?!
I highly doubt it.
What makes you think you know anywhere near enough to judge others who seek help when they've decided they need it?
As angry as your comments make me, I am actually glad that you have been able to do so well for yourself.
But we are NOT you! And that is the peeve that most of us have for an NT world that thinks we are all alike.
WE'RE NOT!! !! !
We do not all have your abilities. We don't all have the same connections in life, or know the right people, or know how to get to know the right people to succeed in this world independently.
YOU, I dare say, are way to young to be thinking you "have what it takes." I hope you do! But at only 25, you haven't that much of a track record yet.
I hope you do well for yourself. I really do! But I'll warn you, I felt exactly the same way at your age! And just because I'm looking into support now, doesn't mean I'm "giving up!"
I'm doing it to avail me and my family of SERVICES that I hope will help us all learn to deal better with life and work or business. It is altogether possible I could end up on assistance for the rest of my life, but that isn't my goal. My goal is to get something else going (a job or a business I can work at for more than a few years without burning out). If that doesn't work out, the more long term goal is to better prepare my KIDS so they [hopefully] will never need public assistance.
We have tried "on our own," and haven't done very well. Should we just keep doing what we have been doing, which has NOT worked well, and keep getting the same results, our kids very likely learning to do the same? Can you see the vicious cycle of dependence that could result from that?
I want you to know that I am FULLY aware of where the money comes from for the programs. Don't forget that that money has come out of MY pocket for more years than you have been alive.
My money has gone to help a lot of people, some of whom really needed it, and some of whom did not deserve it, for 35 years now! So, no, now that I need help (an admission that was very hard for me to make I'll have you know), I'm not feeling shameful about it.
AND, I would never begrudge those who afford themselves of help who really need it.
More importantly though, I refuse to judge those who receive public assistance, unless I know for certain they are defrauding the system. I keep in mind that I do not know their particular circumstances. I do not know if they are truly able to work and support themselves.
And...
Neither do you.
_________________
I'm not likely to be around much longer. As before when I first signed up here years ago, I'm finding that after a long hiatus, and after only a few days back on here, I'm spending way too much time here again already. So I'm requesting my account be locked, banned or whatever. It's just time. Until then, well, I dunno...
How has the standard of living gone up in China? There are 2 billion people there, and riots at the moment because there are millions and millions of people who are working in Dickensian factories like slaves for long hours and very small pay. Yes a few rich there are richer... but a lot of people dont see that as a measure of a good standard of living, when the average person does not have it very good.
I'm sorry, but I don't think you can find any metric by which the standard of living has not been improving in China. Yes there are people working for hardly anything, but there are far fewer of these people now than in the past.
http://www.thehumanaught.com/blog/gener ... of-living/
http://factsanddetails.com/china.php?it ... ubcatid=60
Thats not what I have heard at all. It is an extremely large country with a lot of poor people, though people are not as poor as in India. Living costs are low, but housing conditions are poor for many people. I dont thnk it is a place you would want to be poor, especially in the winter.
There's a difference between 'good' and 'improving', you know! You can't just snap your fingers and have billions of people who were living in abject poverty suddenly have a standard of living like that which we enjoy in the US. The point is that Chinese people are starting to escape from this poverty for the first time in history, thanks to economic reforms returning them to the free market. Everything you posted just goes to show how bad things were over there before the 80s!
No, everything I posted is showing how bad things are there now (the article was written in 2008, not the 1980s) and that standard of living improvements, with a new capitalist system, have only improved for a few lucky at the wealthy end of the scale, with the rest worse off than ever.
_________________
"Caravan is the name of my history, and my life an extraordinary adventure."
~ Amin Maalouf
Taking a break.
How has the standard of living gone up in China? There are 2 billion people there, and riots at the moment because there are millions and millions of people who are working in Dickensian factories like slaves for long hours and very small pay. Yes a few rich there are richer... but a lot of people dont see that as a measure of a good standard of living, when the average person does not have it very good.
I'm sorry, but I don't think you can find any metric by which the standard of living has not been improving in China. Yes there are people working for hardly anything, but there are far fewer of these people now than in the past.
http://www.thehumanaught.com/blog/gener ... of-living/
http://factsanddetails.com/china.php?it ... ubcatid=60
Thats not what I have heard at all. It is an extremely large country with a lot of poor people, though people are not as poor as in India. Living costs are low, but housing conditions are poor for many people. I dont thnk it is a place you would want to be poor, especially in the winter.
There's a difference between 'good' and 'improving', you know! You can't just snap your fingers and have billions of people who were living in abject poverty suddenly have a standard of living like that which we enjoy in the US. The point is that Chinese people are starting to escape from this poverty for the first time in history, thanks to economic reforms returning them to the free market. Everything you posted just goes to show how bad things were over there before the 80s!
No, everything I posted is showing how bad things are there now (the article was written in 2008, not the 1980s) and that standard of living improvements, with a new capitalist system, have only improved for a few lucky at the wealthy end of the scale, with the rest worse off than ever.
It goes to show how bad things were in the 80s because in the 80s things were MUCH WORSE than they are now. I'm aware that there are still poor people in China, but the fact of the matter is that the poverty rate has been falling at a much faster rate since economic reforms were implemented. The claim that conditions have only improved for a lucky few is simply absurd. The poverty rate has fallen from upwards of 60% in the late 70s to about 10%.
Are you suggesting that people should just stay homeless (as I was for 9 months)?
It's wrong to collect it if you are simply lazy, and want to use it as an excuse, but I don't think many people actually do that. They don't just hand out disability. It is given to people who have proven obstacles to employment.
Obviously you have never been fired from min. wage jobs, and lived a life of complete poverty. Do not judge others who have.
Many people with AS are very capable, but that does't mean employers are flexible enough to want to hire them, and put up with their differences.
I have had VERY similar situations, and HIGHLY agree. And am living in utter poverty, well below it I do believe, and my husband is working his butt off for me. And what I get from SSDI is very little to nothing and goes toward keeping a roof over our head (our place is a dump by the way). I have tried to work again and again and again, and have been "let go" from a number of low-meaning, degrading, low-pay jobs, in which I have to deal with humans I hate. Don't presume to think that we with AS CAN just up and be able to work. We need the help for god's sake!
I am unemployed, because I have to be social to get any job around here. I know that someday I will be able to get a job, if it involves filing or computers. I have thought about getting social security, but I feel the way you do. I am too dignified to take money that other people should have. I am not so severely disabled that I can't get a job someday, so I hold off on it. I don't want to walk in that SS office and say, "Hey, I have Aspie's, I need money." It really seems like a crutch. But, I am being supported by my family, too. My mom, sister and step-dad all have jobs. If I lived on my own, I would probably need money from somewhere, and I live in a really small town where it's really hard to find jobs.
I think it really depends on the situation a person is in, and where you are on the autistic spectrum.
Depends on the form of slavery in question. (And since I've no clue what you are responding to, I can't comment on whatever you have in mind by slavery.)
_________________
not aspie, not NT, somewhere in between
Aspie Quiz: 110 Aspie, 103 Neurotypical.
Used to be more autistic than I am now.
Steer the conversation away from the money aspect of Public vs. Private. What do you think of the Nurture aspects of Public vs. Private? Aside from the fact that Autisms seems to have generally horrible and waistful private charities that seem to focus on the wrong things to help. Do you think that the government does a better job helping Aspies? or could a propperly funded and oriented private charity do a better job?
Am I the only one that gets an intensely bad feeling from this topic? This s**t is just way too depressing for people who actually THINK and FEEL. It seems like beyond all our polite civilization, rules, protections, etc... when it comes down to it life is a zero sum game and we are all hunks of meat in the cosmic meat grinder. Take away the institutions that placate us, and the high tech toys that distract us and we'd be at each other's throats. It's all about ME ME ME ME ME f*****g ME!! ! I'm not gonna pay no extra taxes for some bum who can't work! I don't care if he's an orphaned quadriplegic, it's MY MONEY!! ME ME MINE!! Disgusting.
I'm through with this.
I do too. It's carefully rationalized hatred. For those of us who need these programs it's not just a debate where every side is equal.
_________________
"In my world it's a place of patterns and feel. In my world it's a haven for what is real. It's my world, nobody can steal it, but people like me, we live in the shadows." -Donna Williams