By the strict definition, no, because it specifies either male or female. Of course the strict definition is pointlessly limited, and is a bit of a disservice to a lot of people:
Quote:
There are two components of Gender Identity Disorder, both of which must be present to make the diagnosis. Thee must be evidence of a strong and persistent gross-gender identification, which is the desire to be, or the insistence that one is of the other sex (Criteria A). This cross-gender identification must not merely be a desire for any perceived cultural advantages of being the other sex. there must also be evidence of persistent discomfort about one’s assigned sex or a sense of inappropriateness in the gender role of that sex (Criteria B). The diagnosis is not made if the individual has a concurrent physical intersex condition (e.g., androgen insensitivity syndrome or congenital adrenal hyperplasia) (Criteria C). To make the diagnosis, there must be evidence of clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning (Criteria D).
Seems like people who get all shirty about this get shirty about the desire to transition, but I think they ignore the "clinically significant distress or impairment" part and just think "sex = they're all perverts."
Anyway, I think if there's little or no distress in being perceived as a member of your assigned sex and associated gender, it's not gender identity disorder. If there
is significant distress, then it probably is (although if you're not binary, it might be "gender identity disorder, not otherwise specified" and very few will help you transition if you're honest about wanting to transition to some point other than strictly male or strictly female. Maybe some would diagnose you as GID NOS without the extreme discomfort and need to transition? I don't know, I am not an expert, I just read the DSM and associated information.
Being transgender and/or genderqueer has significantly lower clinical requirements.